The judgment referred to in the WC Case Francis D. Costa document is against the injured person, which contradicts the opinion expressed by Mr. Madhu T.K. I request Mr. Harikrishnan to review it and provide a Supreme Court judgment favoring the injured workman.
Kesava Panda.
From India, Visakhapatnam
Kesava Panda.
From India, Visakhapatnam
It is once again reiterated that Mr. Madhu T.K. reaffirmed notional extension in favor of the injured person but referred to a judgment of the Madras High Court different from his, saying "Tamil Nadu State Road Corporation Ltd Vs Smt. Sivakumari & Ors [LLN(1) 2010 (P) 414 (Madras HC)]." It is requested to refer to a suitable judgment in favor of the injured person on notional extension.
From India, Visakhapatnam
From India, Visakhapatnam
Dear Sir,
One of my brothers met with an accident and died while going to the company around 5 AM, but his shift started at 6 AM. He was the only son in his family and the breadwinner for them. His parents have asked the company for some compensation, but the company rejected it, stating that the accident occurred outside of company premises, so they are not liable to pay anything. Does this situation fall under the ECA (Employee Compensation Act)? Can his parents receive compensation from the company since there is no one else to take care of them?
Please suggest what actions they can take.
From India, Bengaluru
One of my brothers met with an accident and died while going to the company around 5 AM, but his shift started at 6 AM. He was the only son in his family and the breadwinner for them. His parents have asked the company for some compensation, but the company rejected it, stating that the accident occurred outside of company premises, so they are not liable to pay anything. Does this situation fall under the ECA (Employee Compensation Act)? Can his parents receive compensation from the company since there is no one else to take care of them?
Please suggest what actions they can take.
From India, Bengaluru
Dear All,
Regarding construction workers, if a vehicle is involved in an accident while going to or coming back from the site, do the employees or any third person fall under the Workers' Compensation (WC) policy? Is there a defined timeframe for the policy's applicability? For example, if a contractor's site vehicle leaves the office and gets into an accident after two hours, would it still be covered by WC even if the vehicle was being used for personal reasons at the time of the accident?
Thank you.
From India, Chennai
Regarding construction workers, if a vehicle is involved in an accident while going to or coming back from the site, do the employees or any third person fall under the Workers' Compensation (WC) policy? Is there a defined timeframe for the policy's applicability? For example, if a contractor's site vehicle leaves the office and gets into an accident after two hours, would it still be covered by WC even if the vehicle was being used for personal reasons at the time of the accident?
Thank you.
From India, Chennai
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.