Hi Shailza & BSuresh,
If you would read the full text of the SC's judgment on 'Spl. Allowance,' you'll note that it didn't direct employers either to merge all or some of these allowances discussed in your post dated 6.5.19. Instead, such allowances camouflaged in different names are not to be there. You'll know a little more when you read the attachments which will help you understand how to proceed further in the matter. Also, read (https://www.citehr.com/612771-sc-judgement-holding-allowances-part-basic-wages.html). The circular issued by the EPFO is also attached.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1273If you would read the full text of the SC's judgment on 'Spl. Allowance,' you'll note that it didn't direct employers either to merge all or some of these allowances discussed in your post dated 6.5.19. Instead, such allowances camouflaged in different names are not to be there. You'll know a little more when you read the attachments which will help you understand how to proceed further in the matter. Also, read (https://www.citehr.com/612771-sc-judgement-holding-allowances-part-basic-wages.html). The circular issued by the EPFO is also attached.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Supreme Court Judgement on LTA.pdf
Judgement by supreme court.zip