63
As per your question regarding how early you can avail leave, the information is provided below.
You mentioned that your expected date of delivery is 4th September 2018. Therefore, if you count back 8 weeks before your expected delivery, it would be June 11th, 2018. You are eligible to avail maternity leave starting from June 11th, 2018.
I hope this information answers your query.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
You mentioned that your expected date of delivery is 4th September 2018. Therefore, if you count back 8 weeks before your expected delivery, it would be June 11th, 2018. You are eligible to avail maternity leave starting from June 11th, 2018.
I hope this information answers your query.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sir, will it be from June, 11th or July,11th ? Also, if I want my maternity benefit before 8 weeks I meant around by mid of May then it will be possible or not?
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi,
In reference to the query above, I would like to apprise you that please refer to your Appointment letter wherein your JD has been described. In case there is no clause in the appointment letter wherein the management has not mentioned to change the JD, they cannot implement it. Please address an application to the HR team apprising them about your medical health. The alternative you have is to avail EL which can be later clubbed into your maternity leave. I further suggest you should fight for your rights. In case of any other assistance, please feel free to shoot any other query.
Thanks in anticipation. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Many thanks, Shamsheer Pal Singh Dhillon Head Legal
From India, Mohali
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In reference to the query above, I would like to apprise you that please refer to your Appointment letter wherein your JD has been described. In case there is no clause in the appointment letter wherein the management has not mentioned to change the JD, they cannot implement it. Please address an application to the HR team apprising them about your medical health. The alternative you have is to avail EL which can be later clubbed into your maternity leave. I further suggest you should fight for your rights. In case of any other assistance, please feel free to shoot any other query.
Thanks in anticipation. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Many thanks, Shamsheer Pal Singh Dhillon Head Legal
From India, Mohali
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...w/64115691.cms
Observing that the state cannot discriminate in granting maternity leave, the Bombay high court has allowed a member of a consumer panel to take maternity leave for six months.
“In our opinion, there can be no discrimination in the matter of granting the maternity leave benefit of 180 days to a member of the district forum who is appointed on a fixed tenure of five years only on the grounds that she is not a government servant,” said a division bench of Justices Shantanu Kemkar and Makarand Karnik in its May 4 order.
The court’s verdict came on a petition by Prerna Kalunkhe-Kulkarni, a member of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Nashik, for a direction to grant her maternity paid leave for six months. After 18 weeks of pregnancy, on December 4, 2017, she wrote to the president of the state consumer disputes redressal commission to grant her maternity leave. Since she got no response, she moved the high court.
Recommended By Colombia
The state’s advocate said she was denied 180-day maternity leave as she was appointed on a tenure post and the Maharashtra Civil Service (Leave) Rules 1981 do not apply to her. But her advocate argued that she has to be regarded as a government employee.
The judges noted that Supreme Court has extended benefits under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, even to women employees of municipal corporations working on daily wages and HCs too have allowed petitions to grant maternity benefits to employees hired on contract or on ad hoc basis.
The judges said in Maharashtra benefits under the Act have been made available only to government servants under the 1981 Rules. “The benefits of enhanced maternity leave to women employees are undoubtedly... intended to give them equal opportunities in public employment,” the bench said, adding that the state’s stand cannot be countenanced as it would amount to discrimination against women employees only because they are on tenure posts.
Allowing her petition the judges said, “For the purpose of granting maternity leave, the petitioner is entitled to 180 days’ maternity leave since she is working in a tenure post of the district forum established by the government.”
My Comments
this clarifies the importance GOI gives to Maternity leave and women welfare.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Observing that the state cannot discriminate in granting maternity leave, the Bombay high court has allowed a member of a consumer panel to take maternity leave for six months.
“In our opinion, there can be no discrimination in the matter of granting the maternity leave benefit of 180 days to a member of the district forum who is appointed on a fixed tenure of five years only on the grounds that she is not a government servant,” said a division bench of Justices Shantanu Kemkar and Makarand Karnik in its May 4 order.
The court’s verdict came on a petition by Prerna Kalunkhe-Kulkarni, a member of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Nashik, for a direction to grant her maternity paid leave for six months. After 18 weeks of pregnancy, on December 4, 2017, she wrote to the president of the state consumer disputes redressal commission to grant her maternity leave. Since she got no response, she moved the high court.
Recommended By Colombia
The state’s advocate said she was denied 180-day maternity leave as she was appointed on a tenure post and the Maharashtra Civil Service (Leave) Rules 1981 do not apply to her. But her advocate argued that she has to be regarded as a government employee.
The judges noted that Supreme Court has extended benefits under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, even to women employees of municipal corporations working on daily wages and HCs too have allowed petitions to grant maternity benefits to employees hired on contract or on ad hoc basis.
The judges said in Maharashtra benefits under the Act have been made available only to government servants under the 1981 Rules. “The benefits of enhanced maternity leave to women employees are undoubtedly... intended to give them equal opportunities in public employment,” the bench said, adding that the state’s stand cannot be countenanced as it would amount to discrimination against women employees only because they are on tenure posts.
Allowing her petition the judges said, “For the purpose of granting maternity leave, the petitioner is entitled to 180 days’ maternity leave since she is working in a tenure post of the district forum established by the government.”
My Comments
this clarifies the importance GOI gives to Maternity leave and women welfare.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks a lot to both of you! Now I literally think I can avail my maternity benefits!
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bhopal
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi, you are employed in a Pvt concern. Your company is covered under the ESI Act. It is under the Shops and Establishment or Factories Act.
Most of the employers are not willing to give maternity benefits to their employees. They make employees resign, stating unauthorized absence from duty. Try to discuss the matter with your departmental head and resolve it.
If you don't want to continue working after maternity, you can fight legally.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Most of the employers are not willing to give maternity benefits to their employees. They make employees resign, stating unauthorized absence from duty. Try to discuss the matter with your departmental head and resolve it.
If you don't want to continue working after maternity, you can fight legally.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
One of my friends is absent for 2 months. He was medically unfit and suffering from typhoid disease. When he recovered, his father fell ill. As a result, he couldn't return to work for 2 months. He has all the medical prescriptions and reports from the doctors. His father is dealing with three health issues - Parkinson's disease, a minor leg fracture, and prostate problems. Treatment for all these conditions is ongoing simultaneously. Currently, my friend is almost recovered, but his father is still on bed rest. Due to these circumstances, he wants to resign and find a job closer to home so he can take care of his father.
My first question is, if he resigns, will the department not accept his resignation? My second question is, if the department issues a show-cause notice, can he still submit his resignation with his genuine reasons?
Thank you.
From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
My first question is, if he resigns, will the department not accept his resignation? My second question is, if the department issues a show-cause notice, can he still submit his resignation with his genuine reasons?
Thank you.
From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
As the question was asked anonymously, the answer to the query in one sentence is as follows: "Consider the said female employee who opted for maternity leave, treat her as if she is working in the establishment and not on leave, and pay her accordingly on a monthly basis."
Regards,
Girish Vivalkar
Indian Labour Law and Human Resource by Girish Jayram Vivalkar
URL: [https://girishvivalkar979.blogspot.in/](https://girishvivalkar979.blogspot.in/)
LinkedIn: [https://in.linkedin.com/in/girishvivalkar](https://in.linkedin.com/in/girishvivalkar)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
Girish Vivalkar
Indian Labour Law and Human Resource by Girish Jayram Vivalkar
URL: [https://girishvivalkar979.blogspot.in/](https://girishvivalkar979.blogspot.in/)
LinkedIn: [https://in.linkedin.com/in/girishvivalkar](https://in.linkedin.com/in/girishvivalkar)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Woman Employee Benefits Maternity Benefit Act, 1971 assures the benefits to working women because at the productive stage they are exposed to special risk during pregnancy.
The objective of this Act is to let the working women take rest during the period of pregnancy and for a few days even after childbirth. This rest period being considerably long, therefore, this Act ensures that the employer does not terminate the employment because of the long leave.
The employers covered in the Act are PROHIBITED: For knowingly employing any woman or taking work by a woman during a certain period, i.e., 6 weeks immediately following the date of delivery or miscarriage. On request, a woman cannot be given any work of the following nature:
- which is arduous in nature
- which requires long hours of standing
- which in any way is likely to interfere with her pregnancy
- which in any way is likely to interfere with the normal delivery of a child.
Sec. 6 specifies the period for leave under this Act: One month immediately preceding the period of 6 weeks before the date of delivery. Any period during the said 6 weeks for which the pregnant woman does not avail of leave of absence. However, a woman is required to apply, stating the period to avail of the benefit.
Sec. 5, any pregnant woman is entitled to, and the employer shall be liable for, the payment of her maternity benefits at the average daily rate for the period as specified above. The following conditions are to be fulfilled before maternity benefits become payable:
The woman should have worked for at least 80 days in that establishment.
The maximum period for which that woman is entitled to the benefits is restricted to 12 weeks, of which not more than 6 weeks shall proceed the date of her expected delivery.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The objective of this Act is to let the working women take rest during the period of pregnancy and for a few days even after childbirth. This rest period being considerably long, therefore, this Act ensures that the employer does not terminate the employment because of the long leave.
The employers covered in the Act are PROHIBITED: For knowingly employing any woman or taking work by a woman during a certain period, i.e., 6 weeks immediately following the date of delivery or miscarriage. On request, a woman cannot be given any work of the following nature:
- which is arduous in nature
- which requires long hours of standing
- which in any way is likely to interfere with her pregnancy
- which in any way is likely to interfere with the normal delivery of a child.
Sec. 6 specifies the period for leave under this Act: One month immediately preceding the period of 6 weeks before the date of delivery. Any period during the said 6 weeks for which the pregnant woman does not avail of leave of absence. However, a woman is required to apply, stating the period to avail of the benefit.
Sec. 5, any pregnant woman is entitled to, and the employer shall be liable for, the payment of her maternity benefits at the average daily rate for the period as specified above. The following conditions are to be fulfilled before maternity benefits become payable:
The woman should have worked for at least 80 days in that establishment.
The maximum period for which that woman is entitled to the benefits is restricted to 12 weeks, of which not more than 6 weeks shall proceed the date of her expected delivery.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.