Mr. Yadav, first of all, please correct that I am not giving you guidance. I have responded to the queries of the post.
We should respect the Judgment of the SC. I have full faith in the institutions Hon'ble SC. SC follows the rule of law, not emotions of the common man. I am damn sure that I will get justice. The method of SC may be different.
Coming to your discussion as you are bound to follow due process of law.
My little knowledge says the judgment of SC becomes the Law of the land. Enforcement of Law of the land is not being enforced by the written materials of the books. It is being enforced by the judgments of SC.
There cannot be two sets of law for enforcement of the principle of natural justice for the same cause of action. Separate law for the state and separate law for private stakeholders.
Private players learn from the act of state. Hence, if SC has expressed some viewpoint to safeguard the state, then naturally it becomes applicable for all.
It is another matter whether one should follow due process of law or not. Law is a matter of interpretation. Hence, everyday judgments are impugned before the court of Law.
Please find attached my written Arguments before the SC and request you to kindly read only para 24 to 27. It will not take much of your time but will answer all your queries of your post.
Choice is yours... Which path you adopt...
Regards,
Om Prakash Poddar MSW & LABOUR LAW NEW DELHI 09968337815
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
12We should respect the Judgment of the SC. I have full faith in the institutions Hon'ble SC. SC follows the rule of law, not emotions of the common man. I am damn sure that I will get justice. The method of SC may be different.
Coming to your discussion as you are bound to follow due process of law.
My little knowledge says the judgment of SC becomes the Law of the land. Enforcement of Law of the land is not being enforced by the written materials of the books. It is being enforced by the judgments of SC.
There cannot be two sets of law for enforcement of the principle of natural justice for the same cause of action. Separate law for the state and separate law for private stakeholders.
Private players learn from the act of state. Hence, if SC has expressed some viewpoint to safeguard the state, then naturally it becomes applicable for all.
It is another matter whether one should follow due process of law or not. Law is a matter of interpretation. Hence, everyday judgments are impugned before the court of Law.
Please find attached my written Arguments before the SC and request you to kindly read only para 24 to 27. It will not take much of your time but will answer all your queries of your post.
Choice is yours... Which path you adopt...
Regards,
Om Prakash Poddar MSW & LABOUR LAW NEW DELHI 09968337815
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Khushboo vs Kanniammal - Supreme Court Judgment - A Perspective.doc
Supreme court judgment on min wages (AIRFREIGHT).pd f