I completely agree with Tsivasankaran except that he (the leaving employee) should not be allowed to rejoin after leave. Even Anshoo suggested a good point. Nowhere in the law (as far as I know) has it been mentioned that no one can take leave during the notice period. Let's not shift our focus to the departing individual; rather, let's concentrate on those who are currently with us. Taking further action against him may lead to more problems. It is understood that he had informed the authority of his absence. If he has leave due and applies for it, the leave may be granted. No leave, no pay.
From India, Haora
From India, Haora
As per the above discussion about the NOTICE PERIOD served, a question arises in my mind. If a person worked for an employer and due to uncertainty (family problems), he is asking for leave but it is not sanctioned, and the person goes on leave to attend to family matters. Even though his father is hospitalized (ICU) due to heart problems, he is asked by the employer to resign on humanity grounds as he needs to attend to his father whose life is in danger. The employer accepts his resignation and immediately appoints a former employee to take his place. However, when the person asks for his 12 days' salary and full and final settlement, the employer states that he didn't serve the required 3 months' notice period, despite already appointing a new employee in his place. Now, the person is helpless and in a very critical financial condition due to his father's bypass surgery and the burden on his family.
In this connection, kindly share your views and suggestions.
From India, Vadodara
In this connection, kindly share your views and suggestions.
From India, Vadodara
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.