Hi Sid,
Appriciate your sugestions and initiatives towards the members participating in Cite HR.
I Feel that any thing posted on this site must have a prime focus on human resources development and sharing of best of Knowledge in this field.While what people should accept from this cite is Best and the next practices in hr which basically should be aimed and implemented for the betterment of corporate community and social welfare.
I am sure all members would be sharing best of their experinces and knowledge which will benifit people like us always.
Long live Cite Hr.
Thanks
Bijay.
From India, Vadodara
366Appriciate your sugestions and initiatives towards the members participating in Cite HR.
I Feel that any thing posted on this site must have a prime focus on human resources development and sharing of best of Knowledge in this field.While what people should accept from this cite is Best and the next practices in hr which basically should be aimed and implemented for the betterment of corporate community and social welfare.
I am sure all members would be sharing best of their experinces and knowledge which will benifit people like us always.
Long live Cite Hr.
Thanks
Bijay.
From India, Vadodara
One of the only ways we can have deeper conversations here is if the seniors start a discussion.
They have their wealth of experience and should probably dig to their past and start discussions on things that happened, what was done, and discuss if the situations could be handled in any other way.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Sid
From India, Gurgaon
They have their wealth of experience and should probably dig to their past and start discussions on things that happened, what was done, and discuss if the situations could be handled in any other way.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Sid
From India, Gurgaon
Dear friends,
Appreciations for a contribution is fine so long as it should not be taken as a yard stick to judge the status of a contributor. For example there are a no. of queries which are very fundamental/basic information such as what %age of PF contribution an employer should make. Such kind of queries are repeated very often despite having answered many a time. If the queriests use the Net most queries are answered then and there with out coming to the forum itself as they are available from plenty of (s)cites. I'm personally not inclined to reply on such basic information. Notwithstanding, methinks that this forum and Sr.contributors should concentrate on giving solutions/opinions & suggestions on some of the vexed or complicated scenarios our upcoming members face and remedies are replied using the experience and wealth of information one has at his/her disposal. My opinion is one shouldn't be carried away by these methodology or no. of points/appreciations that contributors received. Others who got lesser appreciations, doesn't mean they are not experts or lazy fellows so they need not be discouraged or doubt the system of awarding these credits.
I am also of the strong view that members should not depend only on views expressed here for the simple reason that Queries are not raised with full information and circumstances differ from case to case, employer to employer and region to region. Thus the solutions cannot be in full measure and foolproof. All the queriest should have their own home work done properly taking cue from views of the forum members. In short the solutions are "without prejudice" and a clause of "Disclaimer" applies always and for every query. Therefore a concluding solution may not be possible in each & every case. Probably, I may suggest, queries can be closed as and when an appropriate or closest to the real solution was posted so that unnecessary appreciations will not arise and accrue.
kumar.s.
From India, Bangalore
Appreciations for a contribution is fine so long as it should not be taken as a yard stick to judge the status of a contributor. For example there are a no. of queries which are very fundamental/basic information such as what %age of PF contribution an employer should make. Such kind of queries are repeated very often despite having answered many a time. If the queriests use the Net most queries are answered then and there with out coming to the forum itself as they are available from plenty of (s)cites. I'm personally not inclined to reply on such basic information. Notwithstanding, methinks that this forum and Sr.contributors should concentrate on giving solutions/opinions & suggestions on some of the vexed or complicated scenarios our upcoming members face and remedies are replied using the experience and wealth of information one has at his/her disposal. My opinion is one shouldn't be carried away by these methodology or no. of points/appreciations that contributors received. Others who got lesser appreciations, doesn't mean they are not experts or lazy fellows so they need not be discouraged or doubt the system of awarding these credits.
I am also of the strong view that members should not depend only on views expressed here for the simple reason that Queries are not raised with full information and circumstances differ from case to case, employer to employer and region to region. Thus the solutions cannot be in full measure and foolproof. All the queriest should have their own home work done properly taking cue from views of the forum members. In short the solutions are "without prejudice" and a clause of "Disclaimer" applies always and for every query. Therefore a concluding solution may not be possible in each & every case. Probably, I may suggest, queries can be closed as and when an appropriate or closest to the real solution was posted so that unnecessary appreciations will not arise and accrue.
kumar.s.
From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Community welfare messages.zip
10 Tips For Building A Strong Relationship.pd f