Dear SIA,
I appreciate Sh Umakanthan for nicely explaining the law position and the citation of the judgement in the Secretary, Tamil nadu Electricity Board Accounts Subordinate Union vrs. TNEB [ 1984(II) LLJ 478 (Mad), which suggests that a union cannot claim, as a matter of right,to do the union work during office hours at the cost of his regular duties entrusted to him.
I am of the strong views that in the particular case, such concession should not be extended to them as they have not been declared as 'Protected Workmen' under the provisions of the I.D.Act,1947 rather they are fighting a case against the company for declaration as "Protected Workmen".
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
455I appreciate Sh Umakanthan for nicely explaining the law position and the citation of the judgement in the Secretary, Tamil nadu Electricity Board Accounts Subordinate Union vrs. TNEB [ 1984(II) LLJ 478 (Mad), which suggests that a union cannot claim, as a matter of right,to do the union work during office hours at the cost of his regular duties entrusted to him.
I am of the strong views that in the particular case, such concession should not be extended to them as they have not been declared as 'Protected Workmen' under the provisions of the I.D.Act,1947 rather they are fighting a case against the company for declaration as "Protected Workmen".
BS Kalsi
Member since Aug 2011
From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
INTIMATION FOR CHANGE IN SHIFT DUTY .docx
New Rate of Sta mp Duty & Registration - Fees Payable .p df