Dear Members
Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
HIREN CHHEDA
09821078457
From India, Mumbai
11Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
HIREN CHHEDA
09821078457
From India, Mumbai
Hi Hiren, I think these are an important judgements and hope this will help to all HR & IR professionals. Avinash Kanoray
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
In my opinion this judgement has peculiar set of fact such as daily employees or wages r engaged for work, so the mgmt could not identity them daily and also feels that they r cannot or may be willing to get engaged daily. Thus impleading the workers as party to proceeding wud araise....
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.
From India, Tiruchchirappalli
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.
From India, Tiruchchirappalli
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
SUPREME COURT-STAY ORDER (ESI IN CONST.) UPLOADED INTO ESI PORTAL.pdf
Khushboo vs Kanniammal - Supreme Court Judgment - A Perspective.doc