REPORTED JUDGMENTS AT A GLANCE August 2019
Any change in appointment letter by corrigendum is not permissible. Guj. HC 888
No automatic absorption of contractor labour on prohibition contract laboursystem. Supreme Court 892
Dismissal justified for misappropriation of fund by an employee. Mad. HC 862
No reinstatement if the workman has lost confidence of the management. Del. HC 885
Sit-in protests inside the factory premises, beyond working hours, is criminal offence. Mad. HC 869
For more Reported judgments please click on the link
https://arghaa.com/news/latest-labou...ugust-2019/689
Happy Reading
From India, Chennai
46Any change in appointment letter by corrigendum is not permissible. Guj. HC 888
No automatic absorption of contractor labour on prohibition contract laboursystem. Supreme Court 892
Dismissal justified for misappropriation of fund by an employee. Mad. HC 862
No reinstatement if the workman has lost confidence of the management. Del. HC 885
Sit-in protests inside the factory premises, beyond working hours, is criminal offence. Mad. HC 869
For more Reported judgments please click on the link
https://arghaa.com/news/latest-labou...ugust-2019/689
Happy Reading
From India, Chennai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Amendments and latest provisions related under Labour Laws2011.docx
Labour Law Update.pdf