Date:30.09.09
Dear all,
In my views a Perfect Manager should have the following Qualities:
(1) Having Qualified
(2) Having good knowledge and experience
(3) Good Communication Skill
(4) Good Planner and forecaster
(5) Good Team Leader
(6) Good Organizer and Analyzer
(7) Decent and pleasing Personality
(8) Responsibility with Authority
(9) Good Cost Controler
(10) Timely Decision Maker
(11) Should be Strict Nature of Personality
What is your views? are you agreed with my above views please reply?
Thanks
(Anil Jangid)
From India, Vadodara
Dear all,
In my views a Perfect Manager should have the following Qualities:
(1) Having Qualified
(2) Having good knowledge and experience
(3) Good Communication Skill
(4) Good Planner and forecaster
(5) Good Team Leader
(6) Good Organizer and Analyzer
(7) Decent and pleasing Personality
(8) Responsibility with Authority
(9) Good Cost Controler
(10) Timely Decision Maker
(11) Should be Strict Nature of Personality
What is your views? are you agreed with my above views please reply?
Thanks
(Anil Jangid)
From India, Vadodara
hi anil,
he should be affable, a good listener (half your problems go away), strict nature of personality (elaborate more on this).
show me the perfect manager my friend? i would be placed to pay and work under him.
here goes:
1. good listener
2. have high level of personal integrity
3. communication skill (agree with you)
4. planning and forecasting (ok, go with you)
5. punctuality
6. stick to words, commitments or promises
7. willingness to learn
8. ability to get along with everyone
9. most importantly good leaders (I assume you meant leaders and not managers) should develop the next line of managers - this is a very critical aspect
the present day managers are scared if someone smart comes up - won't mind to use him/ her. but will always view such a person as a threat. the real fun in working with someone who is better than you is you can use their positives to get their work done and also learn from them. we can get any number of yes-men but the really good ones are the ones who have their viewpoint, able to see you in the eye and tell it to you boldly. these are the ones with whom a good leader needs to be surrounded. if you get any such bold people retain them at all cost - the yes-men will always be found everywhere. these bolder ones are the ones with their thinking caps on, an asset to any organisation, will be a little eccentric but good to have them if you want to be a good manager.
From India, Madras
he should be affable, a good listener (half your problems go away), strict nature of personality (elaborate more on this).
show me the perfect manager my friend? i would be placed to pay and work under him.
here goes:
1. good listener
2. have high level of personal integrity
3. communication skill (agree with you)
4. planning and forecasting (ok, go with you)
5. punctuality
6. stick to words, commitments or promises
7. willingness to learn
8. ability to get along with everyone
9. most importantly good leaders (I assume you meant leaders and not managers) should develop the next line of managers - this is a very critical aspect
the present day managers are scared if someone smart comes up - won't mind to use him/ her. but will always view such a person as a threat. the real fun in working with someone who is better than you is you can use their positives to get their work done and also learn from them. we can get any number of yes-men but the really good ones are the ones who have their viewpoint, able to see you in the eye and tell it to you boldly. these are the ones with whom a good leader needs to be surrounded. if you get any such bold people retain them at all cost - the yes-men will always be found everywhere. these bolder ones are the ones with their thinking caps on, an asset to any organisation, will be a little eccentric but good to have them if you want to be a good manager.
From India, Madras
hii!! there is at least some likelyhood that there will be at least some mismanagers who will have exactly same qualities mentioned above. I believe that in addition to above qualities, an individual has to be a master of risk analysis in order to be categorised as a 'low risk good manager'. If not then he should be a moderate to high risk good manager. May sound weird...
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.