Dear HR Professional, I am seeking your advice regarding a situation that, I believe, involves a breach of trust.
I work as a CXO in a company (let's call it CompA) and last week I was asked to leave. A notice was served to me by the company stating my last date of employment, my stock options, and the variable component of pay.
Last year, I had an offer from an MNC that paid me around 40% more than what I was getting at this company CompA. The founder of the company literally begged me to not leave stating that it would hurt the interests of the company CompA. I really wanted to leave but the founder then said that they will give me stock options and will keep me employed with the company for at least next 4 years till the options are fully vested in me. Two senior HR people including the Chief HR Officer of the company were also involved in this discussion. Now, a few months later he has asked me to leave stating that the contract says that either party can give a 2 months notice. I told him about his promises and why he is causing me financial distress as I do not have any future job. This will impact my income. I also reminded him that I had a job offer and he only asked me to continue and even gave me stock options.
But, now all is gone and I am left feeling cheated. This is a clear breach of trust. I wanted to ask the legal experts what they think about this. Isn't this a criminal breach of trust where I was promised something when the company really needed me but then the promises were not honored? I have proof of all this in chat messages, and also in the message that I sent the company that had made the offer. There has never been an issue with my performance, and I was always appreciated over the years that I was with the company.
From India, Gurgaon
I work as a CXO in a company (let's call it CompA) and last week I was asked to leave. A notice was served to me by the company stating my last date of employment, my stock options, and the variable component of pay.
Last year, I had an offer from an MNC that paid me around 40% more than what I was getting at this company CompA. The founder of the company literally begged me to not leave stating that it would hurt the interests of the company CompA. I really wanted to leave but the founder then said that they will give me stock options and will keep me employed with the company for at least next 4 years till the options are fully vested in me. Two senior HR people including the Chief HR Officer of the company were also involved in this discussion. Now, a few months later he has asked me to leave stating that the contract says that either party can give a 2 months notice. I told him about his promises and why he is causing me financial distress as I do not have any future job. This will impact my income. I also reminded him that I had a job offer and he only asked me to continue and even gave me stock options.
But, now all is gone and I am left feeling cheated. This is a clear breach of trust. I wanted to ask the legal experts what they think about this. Isn't this a criminal breach of trust where I was promised something when the company really needed me but then the promises were not honored? I have proof of all this in chat messages, and also in the message that I sent the company that had made the offer. There has never been an issue with my performance, and I was always appreciated over the years that I was with the company.
From India, Gurgaon
Dear member,
I empathise with your situation. It is unfortunate to note that this happened with a c-suite employee. This is nothing but a betrayal. However, we need to do legal scrutiny of your post.
You have written, "I really wanted to leave but the founder then said that they will give me stock options and will keep me employed with the company for at least next 4 years till the options are fully vested in me."
Whatever the founder promised, did you make a contract for the promises? This is because a promise becomes a contract provided it is legally enforceable.
If not a legally enforceable promise, what kind of communication do you have? In the last paragraph, you have written that you have chat messages. However, whether the chat messages will be considered "contracts" under the provisions of the "Indian Contract Act, 1872" is a moot point.
Your case cannot be handled under the provisions of labour laws. If the case is taken up, then it has to be under the provisions of the contract act mentioned ibid. Therefore, you may approach a suitable lawyer who handles the contract cases. Possibly, the lawyer may give you better advice.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
7884I empathise with your situation. It is unfortunate to note that this happened with a c-suite employee. This is nothing but a betrayal. However, we need to do legal scrutiny of your post.
You have written, "I really wanted to leave but the founder then said that they will give me stock options and will keep me employed with the company for at least next 4 years till the options are fully vested in me."
Whatever the founder promised, did you make a contract for the promises? This is because a promise becomes a contract provided it is legally enforceable.
If not a legally enforceable promise, what kind of communication do you have? In the last paragraph, you have written that you have chat messages. However, whether the chat messages will be considered "contracts" under the provisions of the "Indian Contract Act, 1872" is a moot point.
Your case cannot be handled under the provisions of labour laws. If the case is taken up, then it has to be under the provisions of the contract act mentioned ibid. Therefore, you may approach a suitable lawyer who handles the contract cases. Possibly, the lawyer may give you better advice.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Thanks Dinesh ji.
The chat messages state that "company will suffer a lot of loss if I leave, and there will be a major setback with your departure". A few days after this chat message, stock options were given to me. I have proof of that. I also have written proof to the new prospective employer that states that "my current employer has said that they will suffer and that their DRHP document is pending approval". DRHP approval is needed from SEBI for IPO listing.
So, I believe the undeniable proof is there that they promised and then went back on the promise leaving me in a very difficult position.
From India, Gurgaon
The chat messages state that "company will suffer a lot of loss if I leave, and there will be a major setback with your departure". A few days after this chat message, stock options were given to me. I have proof of that. I also have written proof to the new prospective employer that states that "my current employer has said that they will suffer and that their DRHP document is pending approval". DRHP approval is needed from SEBI for IPO listing.
So, I believe the undeniable proof is there that they promised and then went back on the promise leaving me in a very difficult position.
From India, Gurgaon
Dear member,
The proof you have can it be considered a commitment? When an employer issues an appointment letter mentioning the salary to be paid, it is nothing but a commitment to pay for the execution of certain work. What commitment do you have from your employer?
The chat messages are not formal communication. While giving the rulings under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 sometimes even the oral promise was considered a contract and the courts upheld the validity of it. However, there is no general rule and the rulings differ from case to case. In your case, will your lawyer be able to make a forceful plea to prove that chat messages were nothing but a contract?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
The proof you have can it be considered a commitment? When an employer issues an appointment letter mentioning the salary to be paid, it is nothing but a commitment to pay for the execution of certain work. What commitment do you have from your employer?
The chat messages are not formal communication. While giving the rulings under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 sometimes even the oral promise was considered a contract and the courts upheld the validity of it. However, there is no general rule and the rulings differ from case to case. In your case, will your lawyer be able to make a forceful plea to prove that chat messages were nothing but a contract?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
What I am suggesting as proof is not just the chat but the sequence of events. There was no mention of stock options in my employment contract. The options were given only after I resigned and as a promise to keep me employed with the company. It was the earnest request from the company asking me to stay back that shows how they "enticed" me to stay when they needed me.
Why would they give stocks with a vesting schedule of 4 years? Once their need is over, they would let me go. The intentions were not honest to start with. Also, no cause or justification has been given by the company with respect to ending my employment. So the whole scenario is fishy.
Wouldn't you concur?
Thanks
From India, Gurgaon
Why would they give stocks with a vesting schedule of 4 years? Once their need is over, they would let me go. The intentions were not honest to start with. Also, no cause or justification has been given by the company with respect to ending my employment. So the whole scenario is fishy.
Wouldn't you concur?
Thanks
From India, Gurgaon
Dear member,
I doubt your evidence has a sound footing. Please note that your employer is crafty and treachery is in their blood. If you play a victim card, then the employer also could turn the tables and allege in court that the employee had supplicated a lot to release him from employment. So in fact, we were generous in forgoing our stocks and allowed him to go. Now he is litigating and he did the treachery and not us!
The courtrooms are for making allegations and counter-allegations. Wading through the maze of allegations could exasperate you. So if you are really completing litigation then think 100 times. The court cases drag on for years or maybe for decades. If you win, you may not energy to enjoy the victory as it will be a pyrrhic victory. If you lose, then what will be your mental condition that cannot be imagined.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
I doubt your evidence has a sound footing. Please note that your employer is crafty and treachery is in their blood. If you play a victim card, then the employer also could turn the tables and allege in court that the employee had supplicated a lot to release him from employment. So in fact, we were generous in forgoing our stocks and allowed him to go. Now he is litigating and he did the treachery and not us!
The courtrooms are for making allegations and counter-allegations. Wading through the maze of allegations could exasperate you. So if you are really completing litigation then think 100 times. The court cases drag on for years or maybe for decades. If you win, you may not energy to enjoy the victory as it will be a pyrrhic victory. If you lose, then what will be your mental condition that cannot be imagined.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Thanks for the response.
I am not sure what you mean by "supplicated to be released". I had submitted a resignation letter and then later withdrew it based on promises. So, I am a little confused here because I was the one who initiated the exit process last year. There is no proof that I begged to go. On the contrary, I have emails where I have told the company that I do not want to go.
If I litigate my reason would be to let the prospective and current employees know the true colors of the company. Also, the company 's name would be in newspapers for wrong reasons. I can then let the lawsuit go cold. My intention is not to recover money.
Basically, I do not want anyone to be treated the way I was. The company also has to learn that.
From India, Gurgaon
I am not sure what you mean by "supplicated to be released". I had submitted a resignation letter and then later withdrew it based on promises. So, I am a little confused here because I was the one who initiated the exit process last year. There is no proof that I begged to go. On the contrary, I have emails where I have told the company that I do not want to go.
If I litigate my reason would be to let the prospective and current employees know the true colors of the company. Also, the company 's name would be in newspapers for wrong reasons. I can then let the lawsuit go cold. My intention is not to recover money.
Basically, I do not want anyone to be treated the way I was. The company also has to learn that.
From India, Gurgaon
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Enforcement of negative covenants in employment terms.pdf