On 18 December 2025, a Chennai based fintech company faced backlash after employees posted online that their variable pay was reduced sharply because the firm changed performance rating categories mid cycle. Workers said the company added a new rating band and reclassified many employees without clear communication. This led to sudden reductions in quarterly incentives, which some employees discovered only when they received their payslips. The Reddit post gained traction across tech communities, prompting questions about transparency, fairness, and legal validity of retrospective pay policy changes.
Employees expressed anger and disappointment, saying they felt blindsided by the sudden pay cuts. Several team members said they had met their original KPIs but were moved to a new rating bracket that instantly reduced their earnings. Affected workers said the experience damaged trust and made them feel that performance systems were manipulated to reduce payouts. Many also said they were hesitant to raise formal grievances because they feared being labeled as problematic or disloyal in a competitive work environment where jobs are increasingly unstable.
From a compliance standpoint, retrospective changes to variable pay and performance rating structures can violate the principles of fair wage communication under the Code on Wages and contractual obligations under offer letters. Employers must clearly disclose compensation structures, maintain consistency throughout the assessment cycle, and document rating changes with transparent criteria. HR teams should review their appraisal systems, issue written communication before implementing structural changes, and create review mechanisms for disputed ratings. Leadership must recognise that opaque compensation changes can damage employer brand and may trigger legal challenges.
How should companies communicate performance structure changes to avoid backlash?
What review mechanisms ensure fairness in rating linked compensation?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7Employees expressed anger and disappointment, saying they felt blindsided by the sudden pay cuts. Several team members said they had met their original KPIs but were moved to a new rating bracket that instantly reduced their earnings. Affected workers said the experience damaged trust and made them feel that performance systems were manipulated to reduce payouts. Many also said they were hesitant to raise formal grievances because they feared being labeled as problematic or disloyal in a competitive work environment where jobs are increasingly unstable.
From a compliance standpoint, retrospective changes to variable pay and performance rating structures can violate the principles of fair wage communication under the Code on Wages and contractual obligations under offer letters. Employers must clearly disclose compensation structures, maintain consistency throughout the assessment cycle, and document rating changes with transparent criteria. HR teams should review their appraisal systems, issue written communication before implementing structural changes, and create review mechanisms for disputed ratings. Leadership must recognise that opaque compensation changes can damage employer brand and may trigger legal challenges.
How should companies communicate performance structure changes to avoid backlash?
What review mechanisms ensure fairness in rating linked compensation?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The situation described highlights the importance of clear and transparent communication in managing changes to performance structures and compensation. Here's a step-by-step action plan to handle such situations:
1. Clear Communication: Any changes to the performance structure should be communicated clearly and well in advance. This can be done through emails, team meetings, or one-on-one discussions. The communication should explain the reasons for the change, how it will affect the employees, and what the new performance expectations are.
2. Transparency: Transparency is key in maintaining trust. The criteria for the new performance rating should be clearly defined and shared with all employees. This will help them understand what is expected of them and how they can achieve their goals.
3. Training: Provide training to managers and employees on the new performance structure. This will help them understand the changes and how to adapt to them.
4. Review Mechanisms: Establish a fair and transparent review mechanism for disputed ratings. This could involve a panel of managers or HR professionals who can objectively assess the disputed ratings.
5. Legal Compliance: Ensure that all changes are in compliance with the Code on Wages and other relevant labor laws. This includes maintaining consistency in compensation structures and documenting all changes.
Additional tips include involving employees in the decision-making process, providing support during the transition period, and regularly reviewing the new performance structure to ensure it is working as intended. Avoid making sudden changes without proper communication, as this can lead to confusion, frustration, and potential legal issues.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Clear Communication: Any changes to the performance structure should be communicated clearly and well in advance. This can be done through emails, team meetings, or one-on-one discussions. The communication should explain the reasons for the change, how it will affect the employees, and what the new performance expectations are.
2. Transparency: Transparency is key in maintaining trust. The criteria for the new performance rating should be clearly defined and shared with all employees. This will help them understand what is expected of them and how they can achieve their goals.
3. Training: Provide training to managers and employees on the new performance structure. This will help them understand the changes and how to adapt to them.
4. Review Mechanisms: Establish a fair and transparent review mechanism for disputed ratings. This could involve a panel of managers or HR professionals who can objectively assess the disputed ratings.
5. Legal Compliance: Ensure that all changes are in compliance with the Code on Wages and other relevant labor laws. This includes maintaining consistency in compensation structures and documenting all changes.
Additional tips include involving employees in the decision-making process, providing support during the transition period, and regularly reviewing the new performance structure to ensure it is working as intended. Avoid making sudden changes without proper communication, as this can lead to confusion, frustration, and potential legal issues.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Improving Employee Performance Through Workplace Coaching.pdf
Compensation Structure.ppt