A viral Reddit post circulating on December 20, 2025 revealed that a mid-sized corporate office had begun imposing a Rs 100 fine on employees who didn’t wear “traditional Indian attire” on designated Fridays — with senior leaders fined Rs 500. The internal HR email shared online showed that fines were to be deposited into the company’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) fund. Some staff were frustrated because they are not financially positioned to buy new ethnic wear, and felt the policy discriminated and penalised personal choice. Legal experts highlighted that Indian labour law does not allow wage deductions for dress code non-compliance unless explicitly specified in contracts and falling under permissible wage deduction categories. This story spread rapidly across LinkedIn HR circles and employee forums, sparking questions about corporate culture and the legal limits of dress code enforcement.
The emotional reactions among workers have ranged from embarrassment to outrage and humor-tinged disbelief. Many employees feel the fine is unreasonable, unfair, and a misuse of HR authority, especially when tied to personal expression and cultural identity. Several shared that this kind of punitive policy contributes to resentment, decreased morale, and workplace gossip, rather than genuine cultural celebration. Mid-career professionals expressed concern that punitive dress code practices could signal a culture of micromanagement. HR professionals observing the thread have voiced that such policies — when poorly thought through and legally weak — can undermine trust between staff and leadership. Some employees said they’d rather simply opt out of “cultural participation” than be fined monthly, highlighting that incentives — not penalties — often work better for genuine cultural engagement.
From a compliance lens, the policy raises serious red flags under the Code on Wages, 2019, which strictly limits permissible wage deductions to specific categories such as absence from duty, PF/ESI dues, and recovery of loans. Dress code fines are not recognised grounds for deductions, and implementing them without clear contractual basis may expose the employer to claims of unfair labour practices and inspections. HR must urgently review such policies with legal counsel, explicitly tie voluntary cultural participation to opt-in incentives rather than punitive measures, and ensure employee handbooks differentiate encouragement from coercion. This incident highlights the importance of aligning workplace culture initiatives with legal boundaries and ethical communication, lest well-intended cultural policies backfire into compliance and morale crises.
Should organisations use fines at all in enforcing cultural workplace norms?
How can HR balance cultural initiatives with legal compliance and employee autonomy?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7The emotional reactions among workers have ranged from embarrassment to outrage and humor-tinged disbelief. Many employees feel the fine is unreasonable, unfair, and a misuse of HR authority, especially when tied to personal expression and cultural identity. Several shared that this kind of punitive policy contributes to resentment, decreased morale, and workplace gossip, rather than genuine cultural celebration. Mid-career professionals expressed concern that punitive dress code practices could signal a culture of micromanagement. HR professionals observing the thread have voiced that such policies — when poorly thought through and legally weak — can undermine trust between staff and leadership. Some employees said they’d rather simply opt out of “cultural participation” than be fined monthly, highlighting that incentives — not penalties — often work better for genuine cultural engagement.
From a compliance lens, the policy raises serious red flags under the Code on Wages, 2019, which strictly limits permissible wage deductions to specific categories such as absence from duty, PF/ESI dues, and recovery of loans. Dress code fines are not recognised grounds for deductions, and implementing them without clear contractual basis may expose the employer to claims of unfair labour practices and inspections. HR must urgently review such policies with legal counsel, explicitly tie voluntary cultural participation to opt-in incentives rather than punitive measures, and ensure employee handbooks differentiate encouragement from coercion. This incident highlights the importance of aligning workplace culture initiatives with legal boundaries and ethical communication, lest well-intended cultural policies backfire into compliance and morale crises.
Should organisations use fines at all in enforcing cultural workplace norms?
How can HR balance cultural initiatives with legal compliance and employee autonomy?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Organisations should be cautious when considering the use of fines to enforce cultural workplace norms. While the intention might be to promote cultural diversity and inclusion, the implementation could lead to negative consequences, as seen in the case mentioned.
From a legal perspective, the Code on Wages, 2019, in India does not recognise dress code fines as a permissible ground for wage deductions. Implementing such fines without a clear contractual basis could expose the organisation to claims of unfair labour practices and inspections. Therefore, it's crucial that any policy related to dress code is reviewed by legal counsel to ensure compliance with local labour laws.
From an HR perspective, it's important to balance cultural initiatives with respect for employee autonomy. Instead of imposing fines, organisations could consider opt-in incentives to encourage employees to participate in cultural activities. For example, they could offer a "Cultural Day" where employees are encouraged, but not required, to wear traditional attire, with rewards for participation.
Furthermore, communication is key. Any policy changes should be clearly communicated to all employees, and their feedback should be taken into account. This can help prevent misunderstandings and resentment.
Finally, HR should ensure that the employee handbook clearly differentiates between encouragement and coercion. It should be made clear that participation in cultural activities is voluntary and not a requirement.
In conclusion, while promoting cultural diversity in the workplace is commendable, it should not come at the expense of employee autonomy or legal compliance. It's always better to encourage participation through positive reinforcement rather than punitive measures.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From a legal perspective, the Code on Wages, 2019, in India does not recognise dress code fines as a permissible ground for wage deductions. Implementing such fines without a clear contractual basis could expose the organisation to claims of unfair labour practices and inspections. Therefore, it's crucial that any policy related to dress code is reviewed by legal counsel to ensure compliance with local labour laws.
From an HR perspective, it's important to balance cultural initiatives with respect for employee autonomy. Instead of imposing fines, organisations could consider opt-in incentives to encourage employees to participate in cultural activities. For example, they could offer a "Cultural Day" where employees are encouraged, but not required, to wear traditional attire, with rewards for participation.
Furthermore, communication is key. Any policy changes should be clearly communicated to all employees, and their feedback should be taken into account. This can help prevent misunderstandings and resentment.
Finally, HR should ensure that the employee handbook clearly differentiates between encouragement and coercion. It should be made clear that participation in cultural activities is voluntary and not a requirement.
In conclusion, while promoting cultural diversity in the workplace is commendable, it should not come at the expense of employee autonomy or legal compliance. It's always better to encourage participation through positive reinforcement rather than punitive measures.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Improving Employee Performance Through Workplace Coaching.pdf
Formal Dress Code.pps
Dress Code.doc