Earlier this year, a software engineer at a mid-sized Bangalore startup posted on LinkedIn that her request for “mental health leave” was denied by HR, who said it wasn't a “valid reason” under company leave policy. The post went viral, triggering a debate on whether Indian HR policies are keeping up with modern realities.
Example: Several startups now offer "wellness days," but few provide actual mental health coverage or trained support.
Is mental health still seen as an excuse rather than a legitimate health concern in our workplaces? What steps can HR take to define and support it within existing policies?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Example: Several startups now offer "wellness days," but few provide actual mental health coverage or trained support.
Is mental health still seen as an excuse rather than a legitimate health concern in our workplaces? What steps can HR take to define and support it within existing policies?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The denial of request for “mental health leave” was justified and legal.
The denial of HR is valid, because wasn't a “valid reason” under company leave policy.
Under the law and rules,there doesn't exist "wellness days,". Those are doing so inviting sole problem for them in statutory front.
The HR should consider the employees with frequent mental health sickness are to be considered unfit for service.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
689The denial of HR is valid, because wasn't a “valid reason” under company leave policy.
Under the law and rules,there doesn't exist "wellness days,". Those are doing so inviting sole problem for them in statutory front.
The HR should consider the employees with frequent mental health sickness are to be considered unfit for service.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It is high time companies change their leave policies.
We need to normalize talking about mental health and illness.
Suppose a person is detected with cancer (2nd Stage). They would have to take frequent leaves for their chemo and treatment. Would you throw that person out of your organization?
In a similar manner if someone is diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder, they are not unfit for the organization. All they need is support and consideration.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
We need to normalize talking about mental health and illness.
Suppose a person is detected with cancer (2nd Stage). They would have to take frequent leaves for their chemo and treatment. Would you throw that person out of your organization?
In a similar manner if someone is diagnosed with a mental illness or disorder, they are not unfit for the organization. All they need is support and consideration.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The companies can not change their leave policies in whimsg.
The employees working in companies gets leave under the Acts and Rules extended under Factory Act & Rules, Mines Act,/Rule and Shops and Commercial establishments.
The company does not provide leave,. But employees earn their leave for subsequent year(1 day leave per 20 days working in current year). The employees should stand eligible, if put 240 days working in the calender year.
The one will get no leave, if his working is less than 240 days or as per the rules exist in that state.
The company frames policy to administrate the grant and monitoring of Earned Leaves.
The company is a business house, motive is profit. The charitable company can consider such request of wellness. The sick employee or normal employee can avail leaves in their account, or other wise LOP. The prolong sickness causes absenteeism and long absent opens avenue for termination but scenario is tough for insane employee.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
The employees working in companies gets leave under the Acts and Rules extended under Factory Act & Rules, Mines Act,/Rule and Shops and Commercial establishments.
The company does not provide leave,. But employees earn their leave for subsequent year(1 day leave per 20 days working in current year). The employees should stand eligible, if put 240 days working in the calender year.
The one will get no leave, if his working is less than 240 days or as per the rules exist in that state.
The company frames policy to administrate the grant and monitoring of Earned Leaves.
The company is a business house, motive is profit. The charitable company can consider such request of wellness. The sick employee or normal employee can avail leaves in their account, or other wise LOP. The prolong sickness causes absenteeism and long absent opens avenue for termination but scenario is tough for insane employee.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your explanation of leave policies is accurate. However, mental health is a serious concern and companies should consider it within their leave policies for overall employee wellbeing. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Workplace-Menta l-Health-scaled .jpeg
Aligning HR Policies to Business Objectives.ppt
HR policies & procedures May 2007.pdf
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your comparison between physical and mental health is apt. It's crucial for companies to support employees' mental health, just like physical health. (1 Acknowledge point)