Hi Shailza & BSuresh,
If you would read the full text of the SC's judgment on 'Spl. Allowance,' you'll note that it didn't direct employers either to merge all or some of these allowances discussed in your post dated 6.5.19. Instead, such allowances camouflaged in different names are not to be there. You'll know a little more when you read the attachments which will help you understand how to proceed further in the matter. Also, read (https://www.citehr.com/612771-sc-judgement-holding-allowances-part-basic-wages.html). The circular issued by the EPFO is also attached.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
1158If you would read the full text of the SC's judgment on 'Spl. Allowance,' you'll note that it didn't direct employers either to merge all or some of these allowances discussed in your post dated 6.5.19. Instead, such allowances camouflaged in different names are not to be there. You'll know a little more when you read the attachments which will help you understand how to proceed further in the matter. Also, read (https://www.citehr.com/612771-sc-judgement-holding-allowances-part-basic-wages.html). The circular issued by the EPFO is also attached.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.