No Tags Found!

Dear Members,

Is it mandatory to deduct ESI from the payment of a contractor who has been engaged for the job work outside the factory/establishment premises and where no supervision was exercised, whereas the contractor does not have an independent Code No.?

Thanks,
Apurba Mitra

From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi, How you are paying him salary per month on company payroll.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Interesting question. Please provide us with complete details. It is dangerous to answer these questions with assumptions and limited information.

Most importantly:
- Where is the work being done, and what type of work is it?
- Does it amount to outworking (since that is excluded from the definition of a contractor)?
- Is that place covered by ESIC?
- How many employees does the contractor have, and is he liable for ESIC on his own right?


From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Sirs,

If the work is being done even outside the factory/unit premises as per the guidelines and specifications of the principal employer, the element of supervision by the principal employer is present. Therefore, such contractor employees are definitely coverable under the ESI Act along with the main factory. However, home workers have not been covered under the ESI Act.

As mentioned by Sh. Saswata Banerjee above, there are many factors to be ascertained since the facts of each case may differ.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Work done as per the specification of the company does not, in itself, amount to supervision. If that were the rule, every ancillary unit would be a contractor. So, we need to see if there was any supervision annually, or whether only quality control is being done. A lot depends on the actual facts. At this point, I accept at face value the contention of the original poster that there is no supervision.


From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Thanks for responses. Further explanation in this context is as follows:

A particular job contract is given to the contractors. They execute the job through their workers outside the office premises. There is no direct supervision by the principal employer; only the finished job is checked. The work is carried out at different locations in West Bengal. Most of the contractors do not come under the coverage of the ESI Act due to the size of their workforce.

APURBA MITRA

From India, Kolkata
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Apurva,

From the quoted facts, it is conveyed that if a contractor performing any manual job within the factory premises is definitely covered under the provisions of the ESIC, and the principal employer is bound to make or insure compliance. In my opinion, if a contractor is performing job work outside the factory premises, who is not covered or coverable independently under the ESIC scheme and is not totally dependent purely on such job work, no compliance to ESIC is required.

Regards,
P K Sharma

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

If the contractor does not have an ESI Code No., it is your bounden duty to deduct ESI contributions and pay them to the ESI authorities, either along with your employees or separately in your code along with the list of employees.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Apurba,

Since the contractors are not working in your factory, or at a place that is not under your control or ownership, then the contractor is not a contractor as defined under the Contract Labour Act. Please refer to the definition in the act, including the exclusions, to ensure you fall squarely within it.

Since he is not a contractor under the act, you are not responsible for ensuring the payment of wages and statutory dues to the concerned workers. In effect, he is not a contractor but an external vendor from whom you are getting some job work/processing done.

As such, there is no need to deduct ESIC, PF, etc., from the payment made to the vendor.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Sirs,

Following the facts as desired by Sh. Saswata Banerjee in his earlier comments have not been replied to by the starter of this thread:

- "Where is the work being done, what type of work is it?"
- "Is that place covered by ESIC?"

In addition, various other questions will also arise, viz.:

1. Whether the contractors take semi-finished articles from the office/premises of the company and after doing some finishing/job work on said goods, return the same to the principal employer. If so, whether there are gate-passes for such shifting of goods. If required by law, whether the contractors have their separate numbers for sales tax, excise, etc.

2. Whether the contractors have their premises where they work, whether the said premises are registered under shop and commercial establishment Act/rules framed thereunder.

3. Whether such contractors are also working independently for other similar types of units.

4. How the job charges paid to these contractors are being booked/reflected in the accounts books of the principal employer is also important. Whether the said charges are shown as labor charges, wages, etc.?

The coverage/non-coverage of any contractor with the principal employer depends upon the facts of each case separately. It is for the assessing authorities to decide keeping in view the facts based on verification of records. Therefore, in my opinion, it will be better if the matter is referred to the appropriate Regional/Sub/Divisional Office of the ESIC with full facts and the opinion of the employer for a decision on the issue.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.