In our organization, which is a manufacturing industry employing more than 2000 employees on the payroll and almost 1500 workers as contract labor, we are covered under PF and ESI.
In case we engage any firm for certain finance and taxation jobs, aren't they liable to comply with PF and ESI clauses? The firm argues that they will not come under PF and ESI as their manpower is less than 10.
My argument on the above is that as a responsible principal employer, we must ensure vendors with PF and ESI codes because anyone who enters our factory premises should be covered under PF and ESI to safeguard their interests.
Need your advice.
Rgds DG
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
4In case we engage any firm for certain finance and taxation jobs, aren't they liable to comply with PF and ESI clauses? The firm argues that they will not come under PF and ESI as their manpower is less than 10.
My argument on the above is that as a responsible principal employer, we must ensure vendors with PF and ESI codes because anyone who enters our factory premises should be covered under PF and ESI to safeguard their interests.
Need your advice.
Rgds DG
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear DG,
If they have been engaged on your premises under a contract as manpower, you are liable to check whether they are complying with labor provisions such as PF & ESI. If you have engaged them for auditing purposes, you are not responsible for their compliance. However, even if the number is less than 10, they are still required to comply with the provisions of PF & ESI because, as stated, the PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER is always responsible for labor compliances.
Regards,
P. Venugopal Reddy
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If they have been engaged on your premises under a contract as manpower, you are liable to check whether they are complying with labor provisions such as PF & ESI. If you have engaged them for auditing purposes, you are not responsible for their compliance. However, even if the number is less than 10, they are still required to comply with the provisions of PF & ESI because, as stated, the PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER is always responsible for labor compliances.
Regards,
P. Venugopal Reddy
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Yes, sir. Being a responsible principal employer, we are asking the vendor to abide by the CL, PF, and ESI Acts. Since this is a contract of service that will involve 2-3 employees on a regular basis, we are insisting that they strictly adhere to the provisions of the CL, PF, and ESI Acts. However, the vendor's argument is that they are not covered under the above acts because their manpower strength is below 10.
Regards,
DG
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards,
DG
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Vendors normally use this tactic, saying that they have fewer than 20 employees and hence are not covered under PF. Therefore, it would be wise for you to only employ contractors/vendors who have their own code and ensure compliance for all their employees. Otherwise, you may need to provide coverage for their employees under your code number.
Regards
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Regards
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi sir,
I feel you agree with me that these issues, more than statutory obligations, are related to personnel directly. Hence, it is highly suggested to identify a service provider who has the requisite registrations. Please do not deprive the employees of their eligible benefits.
Regards, J S R
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I feel you agree with me that these issues, more than statutory obligations, are related to personnel directly. Hence, it is highly suggested to identify a service provider who has the requisite registrations. Please do not deprive the employees of their eligible benefits.
Regards, J S R
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If they are on contract for service, their employees are to be covered under your ESI/EPF code. It is better to give this kind of work to a consultant on a contract for service.
VARGHESE MATHEW
9961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
VARGHESE MATHEW
9961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sorry Iam correcting my first sentence as "if they are on contract of service their employees are to be covered under your ESI/EPF code." Varghese Mathew
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
For PF, the minimum number of employees is 20, while for ESI, it is now 10. Hence, if the vendor says he is not liable to be covered under PF & ESI because his manpower is less than 10, he is right.
Srinivas
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Srinivas
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
What if the vendor have five clients and he is providing nine employees to each client and say that ESI/EPF is not applicable to him? Varghese Mathew
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear DG,
The argument by your auditing firm on the basis of employee strength being below 10/20 is not valid. The contract you have with this firm is for services, in my opinion. Under this pretext, I would say you are not liable for non-compliance with labor laws.
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The argument by your auditing firm on the basis of employee strength being below 10/20 is not valid. The contract you have with this firm is for services, in my opinion. Under this pretext, I would say you are not liable for non-compliance with labor laws.
Thank you.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
HC All - Trainees not covered for PF -2010.pdf
PF Ledger.xls