akm18
51

No damages for late deposit of P.F. when P.F. dept. committed delays in allowing P.F. code number to the employer.

Held: Levy of damages for the late deposit of provident fund contributions by an employer will amount to high-handedness and malfeasance since the employer has been persistently seeking the allotment of a code number from the Commissioner for depositing contributions. The delay has been due to the Provident Fund Authorities, so they could not levy damages for the lapses on their part.

Reference: Poona Shims Pvt. Ltd. vs B.P Ramaiah, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr. 2007 LLR 488 Bombay High Court.

From India, Bahadurgarh
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi Arun Loads of thanx to you for a prompt response. I will try for the said judgemnt. If you happen to retrieve the same, pl send it at the earliest. Regards. Srinivasskvmk
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi, can you please provide copy of this judgment: Poona Shims Pvt. Ltd. vs B.P Ramaiah, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr. 2007 LLR 488 Bombay High Court. Thank you..
From India, Varanasi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.