Dear sir,

Kindly let me know where to complain against my company because the number of employees is more than 20, and they have not registered their company in ESIC. I have told them several times to register it in ESIC. Kindly guide me.

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

The first point is that ESIC is not required when the company has more than 20 employees, but when it has more than 20 employees with a salary of less than 15,000 per month. As you mean that they are covered but not registered, you can complain to the local office of ESIC.

I hope you realize that the moment the inspector steps in and takes action, you will lose your job. Whether or not you have actually complained, your employer will assume that it was you who has gone and given the information and will take action against you.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

to be more exact the condition of ESIC is there must be minimum 10 employees whose salary would be upto 15 k . Gautam Dwivedi.
From India, Lucknow
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

1. Sir, the remarks of Mr. Saswata Banerjee as "the first point is that ESI is not required when the company has more than 20 employees, but when it has more than 20 employees with a salary of less than ₹15,000 per month," appear to be incorrect in view of the legal position as prevalent at present. In order to attract the provisions of the ESI Act, 1948, the requirements are: (a) the unit (i.e., factory) must be employing 10 or more persons, and (b) the said unit (a factory) must be situated in an area that is an implemented area under section 1(3) of the said Act. Even if one person out of 10 such persons is getting wages up to ₹15,000, even then the said unit will be coverable, and compliance is required to be made under the said Act. Even in Mumbai/Maharashtra area, where, as far as I know, the appropriate Govt. has not reduced the coverage to 10 to 19 persons in respect of selected establishments under section 1(5), the units under the category of "factory" are coverable as soon as they employ 10 or more persons under section 1(3) of the said Act. I hope Mr. Banerjee may kindly see the amendment in the said Act carried out in the year 2010 and may also guide me if I am wrong.

2. Similarly, I feel that the remarks of Sh. Gautam Dwivedi as above appear to be incorrect in view of the legal position as mentioned in my submission above.

3. Further, the Local Office of ESIC has nothing to do with the coverage or uncoverage of units under the said Act. The Local Office or Branch Offices of ESIC are concerned with the disbursement of cash benefits to the insured persons and their dependents and with the registration procedure of insured persons. If you have any issues of such kind, you can take up the matter with either the Regional Director/Joint Director (Incharge) of the Regional/Sub Office or the Social Security Officer of ESIC to the jurisdiction of which the concerned unit is situated.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Harsh Kumar Mehta, I am fully agree with your comments Regards, J L Trivedi Ahmedabad
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.