Hi,

A pregnant lady doctor is working on an ad hoc basis (every 89 days it gets extended) in a Delhi Government hospital. What are the maternity benefits she can avail? Will she be eligible to have 180 days of maternity leave after delivery? She has been working in the same hospital for the last two years but on an ad hoc basis. Under which law can she avail such leave, so that she can quote the same in the administration of the hospital?

Thanks,
CLM Reddy

From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Member,

You have mentioned that the Lady Doctor is working in a Delhi Govt. Hospital. Therefore, in my opinion, it will be more appropriate to ascertain the following aspects before expressing any opinion:

1. What are the terms and conditions of employment of the said Lady Doctor engaged on an ad hoc basis? Whether there is any mention of provisions of Maternity Benefits under service conditions as applicable to such employees engaged by the Delhi Govt.

2. Further, it can be ascertained what the terms and conditions are for providing maternity benefits to the regular lady doctors of the said Delhi Govt. Hospital.

It is further submitted that as per the provisions of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961, the maximum period of entitlement for maternity benefit is 12 weeks, of which not more than 6 weeks shall precede the date of expected delivery - Section 5(3). In addition, there is also a provision of maternity leave for an extra period of one month due to illness arising out of pregnancy - Section 10.

3. I think the Govt. cannot discriminate regarding the provision of maternity benefits to the said medical doctor merely on the plea that she is engaged on an ad hoc basis. In my opinion, it will be more appropriate for the said lady doctor to discuss the matter with the concerned officer dealing with the sanction of such leaves in her establishment.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Mathew Sahib, The member who initiated this thread has already mentioned as "Delhi Govt. Hospital"
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear all,

It is once again politely submitted that whatsoever clarification is sought in these columns, be given according to the applicable provisions and not whatever is applicable in their respective establishments or factories. Generally, such quotes confuse a lot of new HR persons who are just taking over the responsibilities and cross over embarrassing situations when they only refer to what is practically going on and do not know or refer to the provisions of the law.

As far as this thread is concerned, the Act is very clear and according to the provisions of the Maternity Benefits 1961, the lady doctor is entitled to the payment of Maternity benefits, i.e., minimum leave for 84 days in the light of the following provisions:-

Application of Act.- [(1) It applies, in the first instance,-- (a) to every establishment being a factory, mine, or plantation, including any such establishment belonging to the Government and to every establishment wherein persons are employed for the exhibition of equestrian, acrobatic, and other performances;

(b) to every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force in relation to shops and establishments in a State, in which ten or more persons are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months.

No woman shall be entitled to maternity benefits unless she has actually worked in an establishment of the employer from whom she claims maternity benefit, for a period of not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery.

In case of denial of payment by the employer on any pretext, the lady doctor can raise her claim as laid down under section 6 of the Act.

P.K. Sharma

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear All,

I support Mr. P.K. Sharma's approach to addressing the issues raised in this forum. Firstly, the related regulations should be explained, and then the specific issue at hand can be dealt with.

Best Regards to all fellow HR professionals.

Sanjeev Agraj
9545507701

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

A government hospital is not covered by the Maternity Benefit Act or the ESI Act because it is not considered an establishment under Section 2 of the Act by any stretch of interpretation. Employees in government hospitals are governed by the rules applicable to their respective government service regulations.

Email: varghese21283@gmail.com
Phone: 9961266966

From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear friends,

It's my strong view that a pregnant woman cannot be denied on the pretext of an establishment is not covered by the Act or status & terms and conditions of employment etc., apparently a wrong interpretation.



In addition to Sec.5 of the Act quoted by Mr.PKSharma Sec.6 also add to the clarity on the applicability and entitlement under the Act.

"Section 6 in The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961:

6. Notice of claim for maternity benefit and payment thereof.—

(1) Any woman employed in an establishment and entitled to maternity benefit under the provisions of this Act may give notice in writing in such form as may be prescribed, to her employer, stating that her maternity benefit and any other amount to which she may be entitled under this Act may be paid to her or to such person as she may nominate in the notice and that she will not work in any establishment during the period for which she receives maternity benefit. tc "6. Notice of claim for maternity benefit and payment thereof.—(1) Any woman employed in an establishment and entitled to maternity benefit under the provisions of this Act may give notice in writing in such form as may be prescribed, to her employer, stating that her maternity benefit and any other amount to which she may be entitled under this Act may be paid to her or to such person as she may nominate in the notice and that she will not work in any establishment during the period for which she receives maternity benefit."

(2) In the case of a woman who is pregnant, such notice shall state the date from which she will be absent from work, not being a date earlier than six weeks from the date of her expected delivery. tc "(2) In the case of a woman who is pregnant, such notice shall state the date from which she will be absent from work, not being a date earlier than six weeks from the date of her expected delivery."

(3) Any woman who has not given the notice when she was pregnant may give such notice as soon as possible after the delivery. tc "(3) Any woman who has not given the notice when she was pregnant may give such notice as soon as possible after the delivery."

18 [(4) On receipt of the notice, the employer shall permit such woman to absent herself from the establishment during the period for which she receives the maternity benefit.] tc "3[(4) On receipt of the notice, the employer shall permit such woman to absent herself from the establishment during the period for which she receives the maternity benefit.]"

(5) The amount of maternity benefit for the period preceding the date of her expected delivery shall be paid in advance by the employer to the woman on production of such proof as may be prescribed that the woman is pregnant, and the amount due for the subsequent period shall be paid by the employer to the woman within forty-eight hours of production of such proof as may be prescribed that the woman has been delivered of a child. tc "(5) The amount of maternity benefit for the period preceding the date of her expected delivery shall be paid in advance by the employer to the woman on production of such proof as may be prescribed that the woman is pregnant, and the amount due for the subsequent period shall be paid by the employer to the woman within forty-eight hours of production of such proof as may be prescribed that the woman has been delivered of a child."

(6) The failure to give notice under this section shall not disentitle a woman to maternity benefit or any other amount under this Act if she is otherwise entitled to such benefit or amount and in any such case an Inspector may either of his own motion or on an application made to him by the woman, order the payment of such benefit or amount within such period as may be specified in the order. tc "(6) The failure to give notice under this section shall not disentitle a woman to maternity benefit or any other amount under this Act if she is otherwise entitled to such benefit or amount and in any such case an Inspector may either of his own motion or on an application made to him by the woman, order the payment of such benefit or amount within such period as may be specified in the order."

------

To corroborate my stand, I think we should be guided by the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (RESPONDENT) Vs.FEMALE WORKERS (MUSTER ROLL) AND AMR.Dt.8/3/2000 extract of relevant portion is as follows (which more or less parallel to the query) :

"..... These principles which are contained in Article 11, reproduced above, have to be read into the contract of service between Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the women employees (muster roll); and so read these employees immediately become entitled to all the benefits conceived under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. We conclude our discussion by providing that the direction issued by the Industrial Tribunal shall be complied with by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi by approaching the State Government as also the Central Government for issuing necessary Notification under the Proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, if it has not already been issued. In the meantime, the benefits under the Act shall be provided to the women (muster roll) employees of the Corporation who have been working with them on daily wages.These principles which are contained in Article 11, reproduced above, have to be read into the contract of service between Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the women employees (muster roll); and so read these employees immediately become entitled to all the benefits conceived under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. We conclude our discussion by providing that the direction issued by the Industrial Tribunal shall be complied with by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi by approaching the State Government as also the Central Government for issuing necessary Notification under the Proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, if it has not already been issued. In the meantime, the benefits under the Act shall be provided to the women (muster roll) employees of the Corporation who have been working with them on daily wages." (not the verbatim)

(Pl.see the case law in the attachment)

Therefore the Doctor by all means should be entitled to maternity benefits under the Act irrespective of the 'adhocism' of her employment or her terms of employment which cannot overrule an Act of Parliament.

From India, Bangalore
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: docx SC Judgment-Maternity benefit to woman on MusterRoll.docx (27.2 KB, 140 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Sir(s),

I am very thankful to the Apex Management and others for advising, "It is once again politely submitted that any clarification sought in these columns should be provided according to the applicable provisions, not just what is applicable in their respective establishments or factories. Such quotes often confuse new HR personnel who are taking on responsibilities and may lead to embarrassing situations when they refer only to what is happening in practice without considering or referencing the provisions of the law."

In this regard, I would like to point out that in the offices of the Delhi Government, the Central Civil Services Rules have been adopted, and therefore, I am unsure if the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 are applicable in such cases. Section 26 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 empowers the appropriate government to exempt any establishment from the purview of this Act, and Section 27 allows for the application of other rules if they are more favorable to the female employee.

The individual who started this discussion has not clearly stated which rules or service conditions are applicable to adhoc employees in the Delhi Government Hospital where she works. She mentioned "180 days maternity leave," which is not provided for in the Maternity Benefit Act. The Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules allow for maternity leave for female employees up to 135 days in the case of pregnancy and 45 days in the case of miscarriage or abortion (Rule 43).

A similar topic was previously discussed on HRcite some years ago, with the citation provided below:

Maternity benefit for adhoc employee in a Delhi Govt hospital.

URL: [https://www.citehr.com/162274-maternity-benefit-adhoc-employee-delhi-govt-hospital.html#ixzz34gInUm6V](https://www.citehr.com/162274-maternity-benefit-adhoc-employee-delhi-govt-hospital.html#ixzz34gInUm6V)

Considering the above points, I believe that when expressing our views, we should also consider the applicable service conditions, rules, and regulations governing the employee's services in each case. Reiterating the provisions of The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, or the ESI Act, 1948, which are not relevant to the case cited by the discussion initiator, serves no purpose. Therefore, I stand by the views I expressed in this thread in my remarks dated 12/06/2014. I welcome corrections from seniors or experts if my views are incorrect in any way.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Sir(s),

I have found another old discussion on a similar subject on CiteHR, the citation of which is mentioned as follows: The Maternity Benefits Act - Civil Service. Submitted for information and consideration, please.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi,

I am working in an IT/ITSM company in Pune for 4 years. I will be going on maternity leave. I have asked my HR manager about the payables and benefits during my leave. She verbally informed me that I will receive the basic of my salary for 84 days after the commencement of my maternity leave. Please advise if my company is doing the right thing as I have come to know that full salary is payable to pregnant employees on a monthly basis as per the Maternity Benefit Act. Is the Maternity Benefit Act different for IT/ITSM companies? She has not given a written reply to my questions.

Looking for expert advice.

Thanks,
Sarita

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear member,

1. Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 lays down that a woman employee is entitled to "payment of maternity benefit at the rate of the average daily wage." The term "average daily wages" has been explained in the explanation of the said section as "the average of the woman's wages payable to her for the days on which she has worked during the period of three calendar months, immediately preceding..."

2. Further, the term "wages" has been defined in section 2(n) of the said Act as "all remunerations paid or payable in cash... and includes (1) such cash allowances (including dearness allowance and house rent allowance)..., (2) incentive bonus, but does not include (i) any bonus other than incentive bonus, (ii) overtime earnings, etc..."

3. In view of the above, in my opinion, the employer is required to pay not only basic pay but also dearness allowance, house rent allowance, etc., and other allowances, if any, applicable in your case.

4. Further, for claiming such maternity benefit, some procedures have been laid down in the said Act, and on receipt of the notice from a pregnant woman and on receipt of such proof, the employer is required to pay the maternity benefit "in advance" Section 6(5).

5. In order to understand your rights and comply with the procedures under the above Act, I suggest you go through the above Act and take action accordingly. The copy of the Act as above can be downloaded from the website of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India, or an updated copy of the said Act can also be purchased from law bookshops in your city.

6. To my knowledge, there is no separate Act applicable to employees in the IT sector.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Maternity Benefit Act is a women welfare legislation. Though the employee is working on a part-time/ad hoc basis, you can extend the Maternity Leave as per your establishment decision to the reasonable extent as possible.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Anonymous
Hi,
I got below feedback from My Manager:
We are paying Maternity Benefit as per guidelines provided in the ACT, and it is not mandatory to go as per exactly what is started in the Act.
Where as company to Company the provisions of passing benefits are different. Hence we are passing the benefits as possible ways as we are in Pvt.Company.
Your second question – salary / wages means – the Basic + DA + HRA , and in our case DA is absent so we are paying the Maternity leave benefits on Basic + HRA and
Paying the Maternity benefits for 84 days salary.
Please let me know that PVt. Company can make own policy refereeing maternity benefit Act.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear member,

1. From your remarks, the question further arises whether DA is not being paid to you as a component of salary/wages. Please examine this aspect.

2. I have already mentioned that the term "wages" also includes dearness allowance as per the provisions of the above Act.

3. It is for you to claim the maternity benefit from the employer correctly as per the provisions of the said Act. In case the employer pays you less, then you can make further inquiries on the correctness of the payment of maternity benefit from the office of the labor inspector or authority of your area created under the above Act. To my knowledge, there are no separate special provisions in respect of the IT sector or in respect of any similar type of industries/units.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

as per maternity act 1961 (3) the money value of the concessional supply of foodgrains and other articles, what does meaning of other articles , and what benefits cover in this articles .
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Other allowance is payable in maternity benefits ..please reply me on this my company saying its not payable as per maternity law
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear member,

1. I think you must have examined section 3(n) - the definition of 'wages' as laid down in The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. I am not aware of the components of the wages used in the wage system adopted in your establishment. It is for you to claim the benefit correctly from your employer.

2. In case, however, you feel that the employer has not made the payment correctly, you can file an application with the appropriate labor department authorities in your area.

From India, Noida
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Sarita All cash allowances as per terms of employment are wages for MB . Varghese Mathew
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.