The enactment of the Code on Wages, 2019, marks a significant change in India\'s labour law regime, particularly concerning the redefinition and restructuring of "basic wages". The legislative intent behind this reform aims to curtail the long-standing practice of wage fragmentation, which employers have used to minimize statutory liabilities such as provident fund, gratuity, and bonus contributions.
Previously, employers frequently structured salaries to keep the basic pay artificially low while inflating allowances, resulting in diminished social security benefits for employees. The Wages Code addresses this issue by introducing a uniform wage definition and mandating that basic wages must constitute at least 50% of the total remuneration. Failure to comply results in the excess allowances being considered part of wages.
From a social justice viewpoint, this restructuring is a step forward. It enhances employees' long-term financial security by ensuring higher contributions towards provident fund and gratuity, aligning with the constitutional vision of a welfare state.
However, the restructuring is not without criticism. Employers face increased wage costs, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as MSMEs, startups, and the unorganized sector. The sudden financial burden may discourage formal employment or lead to workforce rationalization. The lack of sector-specific flexibility raises questions about the practical feasibility of uniform application across diverse industries.
Another significant issue is the ambiguity in transitional implementation. Many establishments continue to grapple with payroll restructuring, compliance timelines, and interpretational inconsistencies due to delayed enforcement and absence of detailed rules in some states.
The restructuring of basic wages under the Code on Wages, 2019, represents a decisive move towards dismantling exploitative wage practices and reaffirms the commitment to social security and fair labour standards. By mandating a realistic wage structure, the Code aims to restore the true purpose of employment benefits and protect workers from artificial salary fragmentation. However, legislative intent alone cannot ensure reform. The real challenge lies in sensitive implementation, sector-specific accommodation, and sustained dialogue between the State, employers, and employees. If executed with regulatory clarity and economic pragmatism, this reform has the potential to transform India's wage ecosystem into one that is equitable, transparent, and robust—striking a meaningful balance between labour welfare and enterprise viability.
From India, Kolkata
Previously, employers frequently structured salaries to keep the basic pay artificially low while inflating allowances, resulting in diminished social security benefits for employees. The Wages Code addresses this issue by introducing a uniform wage definition and mandating that basic wages must constitute at least 50% of the total remuneration. Failure to comply results in the excess allowances being considered part of wages.
From a social justice viewpoint, this restructuring is a step forward. It enhances employees' long-term financial security by ensuring higher contributions towards provident fund and gratuity, aligning with the constitutional vision of a welfare state.
However, the restructuring is not without criticism. Employers face increased wage costs, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as MSMEs, startups, and the unorganized sector. The sudden financial burden may discourage formal employment or lead to workforce rationalization. The lack of sector-specific flexibility raises questions about the practical feasibility of uniform application across diverse industries.
Another significant issue is the ambiguity in transitional implementation. Many establishments continue to grapple with payroll restructuring, compliance timelines, and interpretational inconsistencies due to delayed enforcement and absence of detailed rules in some states.
The restructuring of basic wages under the Code on Wages, 2019, represents a decisive move towards dismantling exploitative wage practices and reaffirms the commitment to social security and fair labour standards. By mandating a realistic wage structure, the Code aims to restore the true purpose of employment benefits and protect workers from artificial salary fragmentation. However, legislative intent alone cannot ensure reform. The real challenge lies in sensitive implementation, sector-specific accommodation, and sustained dialogue between the State, employers, and employees. If executed with regulatory clarity and economic pragmatism, this reform has the potential to transform India's wage ecosystem into one that is equitable, transparent, and robust—striking a meaningful balance between labour welfare and enterprise viability.
From India, Kolkata
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.


88