A recent International Labour Organization (ILO) report shows that Indian workers clock among the longest average working hours in the world, around 45.7 hours per week, which has intensified public debates and HR discussions around work-life balance and after-hours expectations. This revelation comes at a moment when the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025 — a proposed law that would grant employees a right to avoid work-related contact outside official hours and require employers to craft formal after-hours communication policies — is gaining prominence in parliamentary and policy circles. The ILO data has helped put empirical weight behind arguments that excessive workloads and digital availability pressures are systemic issues needing both legislative and managerial solutions.
Workers and professionals across social platforms have responded with empathy, validation, and frustration. Many employees in tech, services, and gig work sectors have posted that the data mirrors their lived experiences: back-to-back hybrid meetings, late-night messaging chains, and blurred lines between personal time and professional demands. Some managers expressed anxiety about how to operationalise disconnect rights without compromising client commitments, especially in global roles. HR communities have described spirited debates on whether organisations should pre-emptively adopt disconnect policies even before any statutory enactment, recognising that legal momentum might soon convert into enforceable workplace norms. The emotional tenor reflects a collective yearning for clearer boundaries and recognition of worker wellbeing as a strategic priority, not just a rhetorical one.
From a compliance and leadership perspective, the Right to Disconnect discourse — underpinned by ILO data — signals an emerging frontier in Indian employment law. While the Bill is still proposed, HR must start translating its principles into internal policies that set expectations around after-hours communication, response norms, and escalation protocols, and establish grievance mechanisms for alleged violations. Organisations may also need to integrate these policies with performance frameworks, recognising that availability != productivity. Leadership should consider pilot initiatives (digital curfews, email-silence windows) and track outcomes to inform policy refinement. In this way, companies not only prepare for possible legal mandates but also position themselves as pioneers in humane workplace governance.
What practical policies can HR implement now to honour work-life boundaries without hurting business outcomes?
How should companies measure success if after-hours responsiveness is no longer a performance signal?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7Workers and professionals across social platforms have responded with empathy, validation, and frustration. Many employees in tech, services, and gig work sectors have posted that the data mirrors their lived experiences: back-to-back hybrid meetings, late-night messaging chains, and blurred lines between personal time and professional demands. Some managers expressed anxiety about how to operationalise disconnect rights without compromising client commitments, especially in global roles. HR communities have described spirited debates on whether organisations should pre-emptively adopt disconnect policies even before any statutory enactment, recognising that legal momentum might soon convert into enforceable workplace norms. The emotional tenor reflects a collective yearning for clearer boundaries and recognition of worker wellbeing as a strategic priority, not just a rhetorical one.
From a compliance and leadership perspective, the Right to Disconnect discourse — underpinned by ILO data — signals an emerging frontier in Indian employment law. While the Bill is still proposed, HR must start translating its principles into internal policies that set expectations around after-hours communication, response norms, and escalation protocols, and establish grievance mechanisms for alleged violations. Organisations may also need to integrate these policies with performance frameworks, recognising that availability != productivity. Leadership should consider pilot initiatives (digital curfews, email-silence windows) and track outcomes to inform policy refinement. In this way, companies not only prepare for possible legal mandates but also position themselves as pioneers in humane workplace governance.
What practical policies can HR implement now to honour work-life boundaries without hurting business outcomes?
How should companies measure success if after-hours responsiveness is no longer a performance signal?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
WORK LIFE BALANCE.ppt
Work Life Balance.pdf
Questionnaire on work life balance.doc