Re-evaluating Performance Metrics: Balancing Productivity and Employee Mental Health in Banks - CiteHR

Incident – On December 3, a 51-year-old senior relationship manager at a major private bank died by suicide in Mumbai. An internal message he sent hours earlier reportedly mentioned overwhelming pressure to meet quarterly targets and fear of humiliation in upcoming reviews. Colleagues said he routinely worked late nights and weekends, with escalating expectations during the festive loan season. The bank issued a brief condolence note but declined further comment as police began inquiries.

Emotional/Workplace Impact – Bank staff across Mumbai are shaken. Employees described crying in restrooms and feeling triggered by the news. Many said they had been silently enduring intense pressure but feared raising concerns would brand them as weak. Some described panic attacks before review meetings. Families of employees posted emotional messages online urging banks to end “toxicity disguised as performance.” Internal WhatsApp groups filled with grief, guilt, and fear — guilt that no one saw signs earlier and fear that such pressure could break anyone.

Compliance/Leadership Lens – Banks must now treat psychosocial safety as a compliance issue. RBI guidelines emphasise fair performance evaluation and responsible sales practices. Leadership must ensure sales targets are realistic, review conduct of aggressive managers, and implement mental-health risk assessments. Documented outreach, counselling programmes, and well-being logs are essential. If internal reviews reveal coercive practices, disciplinary action will be required. Regulators may scrutinise high-pressure sales environments more closely.

Should banks re-evaluate performance metrics that create unsafe pressure?
How can organisations detect early signs of employee distress?


Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Yes, banks should certainly re-evaluate performance metrics that create unsafe pressure. It's crucial to create a balanced performance evaluation system that promotes productivity without compromising employee mental health. This could involve setting realistic targets, providing adequate resources and support, and fostering a culture that values employee well-being as much as performance.

As for detecting early signs of employee distress, organizations can implement several measures. Regular one-on-one check-ins between managers and their team members can provide a platform for employees to voice their concerns. Anonymous surveys can also be used to gauge employee morale and identify any areas of concern. Additionally, training managers to recognize signs of distress, such as changes in behavior or performance, can facilitate early intervention.

From a legal perspective, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, in India mandates employers to ensure a safe and healthy working environment. This includes mental health. If an organization fails to do so, it could face legal consequences.

The action plan could include the following steps:

1. Review and revise performance metrics to ensure they're realistic and achievable.
2. Implement regular check-ins and anonymous surveys to monitor employee well-being.
3. Train managers to recognize signs of distress and provide them with resources to support their team members.
4. Establish a robust employee assistance program that includes mental health support.
5. Foster a culture that encourages open conversation about mental health and discourages any form of stigma associated with it.

Additional tips include encouraging work-life balance, recognizing and rewarding good performance, and ensuring that employees have access to mental health resources. It's also important to avoid creating a high-pressure environment that could lead to stress and burnout. Remember, a healthy and happy workforce is not only beneficial for the employees but also for the overall success of the organization.

From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Sir/ Madam
Those who are loosers and cant complate their work or due to internal politics is the reason to suicide. Most of the companies does that when they dont want that perticular employee on the desk , then they giving unachieavable targets.The person who is the victim is already pressurised under EMI's , Family , Childrens Education so he work hard on weekends also. But who cares campany dont want him on work (may be his superior want to replace him) and that pressure he cant bare so suicide is the option. One more thing after termination or unexpected salary review ( Less than Expected) how he will survive.That is the question. HR is the only option to handle these type of politics in the organization.HR to communicate these employees time to time .

From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
  • CA
    CiteHR.AI
    (Fact Checked)-While it's true that undue pressure can lead to distress, it's crucial to avoid generalizations. Not all companies or managers are unfair. HR indeed plays a key role in employee well-being. (1 Acknowledge point)
    0 0

  • CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.







    Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

    All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

    All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.