Hello Everyone,
Request your view and any case study/legal order on my question, which is ongoing issue in my organization.
Issues : One contractor ABC is working with company from 6-7 years with deployment of 80 workman (local workman). management has decided to change the contractor and deployed new contractor XYZ. Considering the IR issue all the ABC contractor workforce shifted to new contractors XYZ.
Now the workers is demanding to transfer our Gratuity service and balance leave to new contractor, as we are local and continuously working with the company.
In this case need your view and any case study for reference or any court / legal order for the authority, which will support me to take decision.
Thanks.....
Request your view and any case study/legal order on my question, which is ongoing issue in my organization.
Issues : One contractor ABC is working with company from 6-7 years with deployment of 80 workman (local workman). management has decided to change the contractor and deployed new contractor XYZ. Considering the IR issue all the ABC contractor workforce shifted to new contractors XYZ.
Now the workers is demanding to transfer our Gratuity service and balance leave to new contractor, as we are local and continuously working with the company.
In this case need your view and any case study for reference or any court / legal order for the authority, which will support me to take decision.
Thanks.....
First of all there is a question of law and the Principal employer is answerable for that. The issue is that principal employer can certainly terminate a contract with a contractor, in this case, ABC, but he can never ask the new contractor, XYZ, to absorb the employees of ABC.
Second, there is no transfer of gratuity, leave or service from one contractor to another contractor. Certainly, if one establishment is liquidated, and another establishment is formed by taking over the other one, the service benefits of the employees can be transferred to the purchasing establishment. But that happens only when there is a transfer of undertaking. Here, there is no closure or transfer of undertaking.
The remedy available with the workers is to collect gratuity and leave encashment from their employer, ie, ABC. The workers can also demand retrenchment compensation which will again be equal to the amount of gratuity. Though gratuity is payable only to such workers who have put in at least five years of continuous service, retrenchment compensation is to be paid to all workers who have worked at least for 240 days in the preceding year. Then they can seek employment with XYZ as fresh employees and work under them. Obviously, since XYZ has taken the contract to deploy workmen in the plant, they can work under the new contractor.
Now, in a scenario that the principal employer is asking to transfer the workmen of ABC to XYZ, the workmen can even say that the arrangement of contract is SHAM, and is a camouflage arrangement. They can say that all decisions affecting the workmen have been taken by the Principal employer only. If that is the situation, the workmen can ask for regularisation, and if it is proved that the contract is just a paper adjustment, all the workmen will get regularised, and it will then become the responsibility of the the principal employer to pay the gratuity and other benefits of the workers of the contractor.
From India, Kannur
4249Second, there is no transfer of gratuity, leave or service from one contractor to another contractor. Certainly, if one establishment is liquidated, and another establishment is formed by taking over the other one, the service benefits of the employees can be transferred to the purchasing establishment. But that happens only when there is a transfer of undertaking. Here, there is no closure or transfer of undertaking.
The remedy available with the workers is to collect gratuity and leave encashment from their employer, ie, ABC. The workers can also demand retrenchment compensation which will again be equal to the amount of gratuity. Though gratuity is payable only to such workers who have put in at least five years of continuous service, retrenchment compensation is to be paid to all workers who have worked at least for 240 days in the preceding year. Then they can seek employment with XYZ as fresh employees and work under them. Obviously, since XYZ has taken the contract to deploy workmen in the plant, they can work under the new contractor.
Now, in a scenario that the principal employer is asking to transfer the workmen of ABC to XYZ, the workmen can even say that the arrangement of contract is SHAM, and is a camouflage arrangement. They can say that all decisions affecting the workmen have been taken by the Principal employer only. If that is the situation, the workmen can ask for regularisation, and if it is proved that the contract is just a paper adjustment, all the workmen will get regularised, and it will then become the responsibility of the the principal employer to pay the gratuity and other benefits of the workers of the contractor.
From India, Kannur
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Minimum Qualifying service for Gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act.docx
EPFO to start on line service for transfer claims by Aug 15.pdf