Dear All,
Subject: How Can I Claim Gratuity Amount?
I had served in a private limited organization in the Industrial Area of Chandigarh for more than 11 years with zero benefits (no PF/Leave encashment/bonus/no increment for the last 3 years).
In addition to this, I received an appointment letter by email (no hard copy).
I resigned from that organization on the 6th of May with a notice period of 30 days (from 6th April to 6th May). Now, I want to claim the Gratuity amount. Please specify if I am eligible to claim that benefit.
About the Company,
The registered office is in Chandigarh with approximately 8-10 staff members and a manufacturing unit in Baddi with more than 40 employees.
Please guide accordingly on the procedure of filing and the required days.
Thank you.
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
Subject: How Can I Claim Gratuity Amount?
I had served in a private limited organization in the Industrial Area of Chandigarh for more than 11 years with zero benefits (no PF/Leave encashment/bonus/no increment for the last 3 years).
In addition to this, I received an appointment letter by email (no hard copy).
I resigned from that organization on the 6th of May with a notice period of 30 days (from 6th April to 6th May). Now, I want to claim the Gratuity amount. Please specify if I am eligible to claim that benefit.
About the Company,
The registered office is in Chandigarh with approximately 8-10 staff members and a manufacturing unit in Baddi with more than 40 employees.
Please guide accordingly on the procedure of filing and the required days.
Thank you.
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear,
Gratuity is applicable to any factory, shop, and establishment where 10 or more employees are employed on any day of the preceding 12 months. Any employee (other than an apprentice) who is employed on wages and has rendered continuous service for not less than five years (in case of death or disablement, continuous service shall not be applicable). Since you have been employed there for about 11 years, you are certainly eligible for gratuity. You may apply in Form No. I of gratuity. If your employer does not show any interest, you may consult the Labour Commissioner for the same.
Thanks,
S. Kumar
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
6Gratuity is applicable to any factory, shop, and establishment where 10 or more employees are employed on any day of the preceding 12 months. Any employee (other than an apprentice) who is employed on wages and has rendered continuous service for not less than five years (in case of death or disablement, continuous service shall not be applicable). Since you have been employed there for about 11 years, you are certainly eligible for gratuity. You may apply in Form No. I of gratuity. If your employer does not show any interest, you may consult the Labour Commissioner for the same.
Thanks,
S. Kumar
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 applies to:
(a) ...
(b) ...
(c) such other establishments or class of establishments, in which ten or more employees are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months...
Presuming that the Chandigarh Office had 10 or more employees, the Act would apply. The employer is required to pay you gratuity; you are not required to take any action for this as per the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972. If they do not pay you, you can send a letter demanding its payment and endorse a copy thereof to the Labour Department (The Controlling authority as per PGA). It is surprising as to how the employer could successfully evade PF all along for more than 11 years.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
(a) ...
(b) ...
(c) such other establishments or class of establishments, in which ten or more employees are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months...
Presuming that the Chandigarh Office had 10 or more employees, the Act would apply. The employer is required to pay you gratuity; you are not required to take any action for this as per the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972. If they do not pay you, you can send a letter demanding its payment and endorse a copy thereof to the Labour Department (The Controlling authority as per PGA). It is surprising as to how the employer could successfully evade PF all along for more than 11 years.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
First, the poster has to send a notice of claim for gratuity in the prescribed format to the employer by registered post.
Secondly, if no reply is received from the employer or the claim is rejected for whatever reason, or the amount of gratuity mentioned in the reply is disputable on grounds like last drawn salary, length of qualifying service, etc., the poster should file his claim for gratuity with the copy of the claim submitted to the employer, his acknowledgment, reply if any received, etc., to the Controlling Authority for the area where he worked last.
The formats of the forms mentioned above should be as per the Central or State Gratuity Rules as applicable to the establishment.
Other grievances like non-inclusion into EPF, non-payment of bonus, leave encashment, non-sanction of increments, etc., have to be dealt with separately.
Ideally, the poster should engage the services of an advocate.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Secondly, if no reply is received from the employer or the claim is rejected for whatever reason, or the amount of gratuity mentioned in the reply is disputable on grounds like last drawn salary, length of qualifying service, etc., the poster should file his claim for gratuity with the copy of the claim submitted to the employer, his acknowledgment, reply if any received, etc., to the Controlling Authority for the area where he worked last.
The formats of the forms mentioned above should be as per the Central or State Gratuity Rules as applicable to the establishment.
Other grievances like non-inclusion into EPF, non-payment of bonus, leave encashment, non-sanction of increments, etc., have to be dealt with separately.
Ideally, the poster should engage the services of an advocate.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Interesting point here.
The office where he is working has fewer than 10 employees (as it appears from the post above). In that case, will the employer be free to deny gratuity to him, even though the establishment in total has more than 10 employees?
Because the section says "Establishment," not company.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The office where he is working has fewer than 10 employees (as it appears from the post above). In that case, will the employer be free to deny gratuity to him, even though the establishment in total has more than 10 employees?
Because the section says "Establishment," not company.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Yes, Mr. Saswata, I noticed and observed.
But on the same point, a member has mentioned "mfg. unit in Baddi with more than 40+ employees." This indicates that the total number of the establishment is more than 10, meaning the establishment is covered under the POG Act, 1972.
Because the establishment is controlling the manufacturing unit (being HO/Corporate Office) and the revenue source is the same, hence I assumed both are with the same name. Otherwise, what is the earning source for the establishment where 8-10 people are working.
Dear Mr. Pharmadesigner,
Before experts give different opinions, please clarify some basic doubts.
1. Whether both establishments are working with the same name or a different name.
2. Even if they are working with a different name, please confirm whether at any point in time there were 10 or more employees engaged in your company. If this is proved, your establishment is still liable to pay Gratuity.
3. Whether, as per the Act, your establishment has paid Gratuity to any previous employee?
Hope the answers to the above doubts will have a major impact on the opinions.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
But on the same point, a member has mentioned "mfg. unit in Baddi with more than 40+ employees." This indicates that the total number of the establishment is more than 10, meaning the establishment is covered under the POG Act, 1972.
Because the establishment is controlling the manufacturing unit (being HO/Corporate Office) and the revenue source is the same, hence I assumed both are with the same name. Otherwise, what is the earning source for the establishment where 8-10 people are working.
Dear Mr. Pharmadesigner,
Before experts give different opinions, please clarify some basic doubts.
1. Whether both establishments are working with the same name or a different name.
2. Even if they are working with a different name, please confirm whether at any point in time there were 10 or more employees engaged in your company. If this is proved, your establishment is still liable to pay Gratuity.
3. Whether, as per the Act, your establishment has paid Gratuity to any previous employee?
Hope the answers to the above doubts will have a major impact on the opinions.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi Mr. Dangwal,
So, if the factory is in the name of XYZ Ltd, and the office is also in the name of XYZ Ltd, does that mean they will be counted as a single establishment?
Section 3(b) states: "Every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force, in relation to shop & establishment in a state, in which 10 or more persons are employed, or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months."
This indicates that each establishment with its independent shop & establishment license needs to have 10 or more employees and not that you should add the number of employees at the factory (which is separately provided for in Section 3(a).
Logically, an employer should not be allowed to escape the liability this way, but the wording of the act seems to give the option as it does not refer to the company or the firm but to each establishment independently.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
So, if the factory is in the name of XYZ Ltd, and the office is also in the name of XYZ Ltd, does that mean they will be counted as a single establishment?
Section 3(b) states: "Every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force, in relation to shop & establishment in a state, in which 10 or more persons are employed, or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months."
This indicates that each establishment with its independent shop & establishment license needs to have 10 or more employees and not that you should add the number of employees at the factory (which is separately provided for in Section 3(a).
Logically, an employer should not be allowed to escape the liability this way, but the wording of the act seems to give the option as it does not refer to the company or the firm but to each establishment independently.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Saswata Banerjee,
The term 'establishment' has not been defined under the PGA 1972; rather, it has been indicated what an establishment is by way of exhaustive illustrations under Section 3 of the Act. We all know that a company registered under the Companies Act is a separate legal entity with an independent existence from its owners. As such, it can run different forms of establishments under its own common name or in different names. What is important is whether it is an organic whole in terms of its overall administration and business operations in an integrated manner.
In other words, if the company is a cluster or conglomeration of different establishments with a common accounting system or balance sheet, the number of employees employed in a particular branch or establishment is to be ignored, and the total number of employees in the company as a whole is to be taken into account for the purpose of the PGA, 1972.
Basically, a shop or establishment is defined as such with reference to the premises or place where the activities of buying, selling commodities, or rendering commercial services to the members of the general public or internal administrative functions are carried out. For example, the company XYZ Ltd is engaged in retail sales of consumer goods and has different branches in different states and warehouses where cleaning and packaging of goods are done separately. It is not necessary to look into the total number of employees of such individual units for the applicability of the PGA, 1972.
Therefore, my submission is that logically and legally, these branches or units of the same company are not independent of the company that owns and runs them for the purpose of the PGA, 1972.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The term 'establishment' has not been defined under the PGA 1972; rather, it has been indicated what an establishment is by way of exhaustive illustrations under Section 3 of the Act. We all know that a company registered under the Companies Act is a separate legal entity with an independent existence from its owners. As such, it can run different forms of establishments under its own common name or in different names. What is important is whether it is an organic whole in terms of its overall administration and business operations in an integrated manner.
In other words, if the company is a cluster or conglomeration of different establishments with a common accounting system or balance sheet, the number of employees employed in a particular branch or establishment is to be ignored, and the total number of employees in the company as a whole is to be taken into account for the purpose of the PGA, 1972.
Basically, a shop or establishment is defined as such with reference to the premises or place where the activities of buying, selling commodities, or rendering commercial services to the members of the general public or internal administrative functions are carried out. For example, the company XYZ Ltd is engaged in retail sales of consumer goods and has different branches in different states and warehouses where cleaning and packaging of goods are done separately. It is not necessary to look into the total number of employees of such individual units for the applicability of the PGA, 1972.
Therefore, my submission is that logically and legally, these branches or units of the same company are not independent of the company that owns and runs them for the purpose of the PGA, 1972.
From India, Salem
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Saswata,
I fully agree with Umakanthan, sir.
The legal entity of any establishment can't be treated as "separate" merely on the basis of establishing different units/offices at different places/states for different work. If the legal status and other registrations of all branches/offices are operating with the same name, then employees of all places would be counted as single establishment employees.
Accordingly, Gratuity will also be equally applicable for all.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I fully agree with Umakanthan, sir.
The legal entity of any establishment can't be treated as "separate" merely on the basis of establishing different units/offices at different places/states for different work. If the legal status and other registrations of all branches/offices are operating with the same name, then employees of all places would be counted as single establishment employees.
Accordingly, Gratuity will also be equally applicable for all.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.