Dear Sir, Leave salaries are counted in PF wages or not for every month contribution plz tell me anyone. thank you.
From India, Visakhapatnam
2From India, Visakhapatnam
What do you mean by leave salary? Is it that you pay for the leave taken? Or is it that you pay for the leave not taken ( as surrender value)? In the former case, it is payment included in the salary and in the latter case it is not a part of salary for the purpose of PF deduction.
From India, Kannur
From India, Kannur
For leave encashment PF is deductable from the new ruling of Madras High Court.
New Ruling on PF Deductions from Annual Leave Encashment
Last Updated : 17 Jan 2020
As per a new ruling of the Madras High Court PF contributions must be deducted from the payments made towards annual leave encashment. Justice K. Chandru considered several writ petitions filed by the factories before taking the decision.
In a new ruling by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, contributions made toward provident funds (PF) need not be deducted from payments made towards the annual encashment of leaves. Justice K. Chandru looked into numerous writ petitions filed by various factories and stated that any payments made towards leave encashment cannot be considered as part of the basic wage and hence cannot be deducted for making PF contributions.
Employees don’t usually encash leaves they have earned and exhaust them. They rather save it up for a rainy day and encash it either at the time of resignation or retirement or use it as a contingency during times of distress or in the event of their demise. Hence it is not in the benefit of the employees if the payment towards annual encashment of leave goes to the contribution towards the PF.
Even though provisions for encashment of annual leaves have been made by employers, the leaves are seldom encashed and even when done are usually due to contingency cases. In most cases, an employee ends up utilizing all the leaves he/she is entitled to and hence will not even have any leaves left to encash. Hence the judge ruled against making deductions from leave encashment stating that contributions towards PF cannot be based on uncertainties and contingencies.
Also the EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions act of 1952 clearly states basic wage as any and all emoluments earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holidays with wages. Holidays with wages and leaves mentioned here refer to weekends and leaves which are on account of either festivals or other national holidays.
The ruling of the court stands in contrast with the rulings made by the Bombay and Karnataka High Courts. Justice Chandru disagreed with the rulings of those courts and backed the EPF Appellate tribunal that was held in New Delhi in 2000 which stated that PF deductions from leave encashment would open the doors to a lot of confusion.
From India, Aizawl
New Ruling on PF Deductions from Annual Leave Encashment
Last Updated : 17 Jan 2020
As per a new ruling of the Madras High Court PF contributions must be deducted from the payments made towards annual leave encashment. Justice K. Chandru considered several writ petitions filed by the factories before taking the decision.
In a new ruling by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, contributions made toward provident funds (PF) need not be deducted from payments made towards the annual encashment of leaves. Justice K. Chandru looked into numerous writ petitions filed by various factories and stated that any payments made towards leave encashment cannot be considered as part of the basic wage and hence cannot be deducted for making PF contributions.
Employees don’t usually encash leaves they have earned and exhaust them. They rather save it up for a rainy day and encash it either at the time of resignation or retirement or use it as a contingency during times of distress or in the event of their demise. Hence it is not in the benefit of the employees if the payment towards annual encashment of leave goes to the contribution towards the PF.
Even though provisions for encashment of annual leaves have been made by employers, the leaves are seldom encashed and even when done are usually due to contingency cases. In most cases, an employee ends up utilizing all the leaves he/she is entitled to and hence will not even have any leaves left to encash. Hence the judge ruled against making deductions from leave encashment stating that contributions towards PF cannot be based on uncertainties and contingencies.
Also the EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions act of 1952 clearly states basic wage as any and all emoluments earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holidays with wages. Holidays with wages and leaves mentioned here refer to weekends and leaves which are on account of either festivals or other national holidays.
The ruling of the court stands in contrast with the rulings made by the Bombay and Karnataka High Courts. Justice Chandru disagreed with the rulings of those courts and backed the EPF Appellate tribunal that was held in New Delhi in 2000 which stated that PF deductions from leave encashment would open the doors to a lot of confusion.
From India, Aizawl
Thank you..Would also appreciate a reply on..For Loss of Pay.. suppose in a mth a covered employee has LOP of 5 days and still has eligible PF salary above 15000,so PF contribution will be 1800 or will ie be reduced proportionately for 5 days
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
Please note that for PF coverage of an employee, his salary should be Rs.15,000/- or below.
From India, Aizawl
From India, Aizawl
Joshi, under EPF,if you have capped the wages to Rs 15000,that is the PF qualifying salary. If the employee has taken 5 days LOP, proportionate deduction for the purpose of PF contribution should be done from 15000. hence the PF deduction would be on 12500,ie, Rs 1500.
For PF coverage it is not mandatory that his salary should be Rs 15000 or less than that. A company who believes in such social legislation shall cover all employees irrespective of their salary. Only thing is that those who are drawing more than Rs 15000, the Pension Contribution shall be restricted to 8.33% of Rs 15000.(This has been declared unconstitutional by Kerala High Court)
In respect of a newly joined employee also, there is no issue for coverage provided he is not covered under pension scheme. In such cases the entire contribution payable by the employer shall be deposited in to his PF rather than bifurcating it as 8.335 to pension fund and the balance to provident fund.
From India, Kannur
For PF coverage it is not mandatory that his salary should be Rs 15000 or less than that. A company who believes in such social legislation shall cover all employees irrespective of their salary. Only thing is that those who are drawing more than Rs 15000, the Pension Contribution shall be restricted to 8.33% of Rs 15000.(This has been declared unconstitutional by Kerala High Court)
In respect of a newly joined employee also, there is no issue for coverage provided he is not covered under pension scheme. In such cases the entire contribution payable by the employer shall be deposited in to his PF rather than bifurcating it as 8.335 to pension fund and the balance to provident fund.
From India, Kannur
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Karnataka Leave.xlsx
LEAVE APPLICATION.doc