Hi,
I worked in an educational institution as an HR, and I want to clarify the payment of gratuity. If an employee violates the rules and regulations of the educational institution, would they forfeit their gratuity as compensation? Please refer to the case laws.
V. Selvakkumar
From India, Pollachi
I worked in an educational institution as an HR, and I want to clarify the payment of gratuity. If an employee violates the rules and regulations of the educational institution, would they forfeit their gratuity as compensation? Please refer to the case laws.
V. Selvakkumar
From India, Pollachi
Dear Selvakkumar,
Gratuity is a lump sum terminal benefit based on the length of service and last drawn wages of the concerned employee.
Among the various kinds of termination of employment, dismissal is also one. Dismissal in relation to the payment of gratuity implies the dismissal for certain proven misconducts only as per sec. 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Cl (a) of sec. 4(6) contemplates proportionate forfeiture of gratuity and Cl (b) deals with total and partial forfeiture.
Therefore,
(A) what the essentials for proportionate forfeiture of gratuity of an employee are: (i) there should be the occasion of his dismissal (ii) that should be for certain misconduct of willful omission or negligence causing any damage or loss to, or destruction of, property belonging to the employer and (iii) the forfeiture should be strictly to the extent of damage or loss so caused only.
(B) Regarding total/partial forfeiture at the discretion of the employer, the dismissal must be for riotous or disorderly conduct or for any other act of violence or the commission of any offense involving moral turpitude in the course of his/her employment.
What you've simply mentioned is that the employee had violated the rules and regulations of the institution only. It would not be sufficient for the forfeiture of gratuity in the absence of the events aforementioned.
From India, Salem
Gratuity is a lump sum terminal benefit based on the length of service and last drawn wages of the concerned employee.
Among the various kinds of termination of employment, dismissal is also one. Dismissal in relation to the payment of gratuity implies the dismissal for certain proven misconducts only as per sec. 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Cl (a) of sec. 4(6) contemplates proportionate forfeiture of gratuity and Cl (b) deals with total and partial forfeiture.
Therefore,
(A) what the essentials for proportionate forfeiture of gratuity of an employee are: (i) there should be the occasion of his dismissal (ii) that should be for certain misconduct of willful omission or negligence causing any damage or loss to, or destruction of, property belonging to the employer and (iii) the forfeiture should be strictly to the extent of damage or loss so caused only.
(B) Regarding total/partial forfeiture at the discretion of the employer, the dismissal must be for riotous or disorderly conduct or for any other act of violence or the commission of any offense involving moral turpitude in the course of his/her employment.
What you've simply mentioned is that the employee had violated the rules and regulations of the institution only. It would not be sufficient for the forfeiture of gratuity in the absence of the events aforementioned.
From India, Salem
You can forfeit gratuity only if the service of the employee is terminated for misconduct related to moral turpitude/misappropriation of funds after conducting a proper domestic inquiry giving him a chance to defend himself as per the principles of natural justice.
From India, Kolkata
From India, Kolkata
Before forfeiting gratuity, you as an employer should issue a show cause notice to the employee asking him to "show cause" why his gratuity should not be forfeited for the reported misconduct. Based on his reply and after applying all parameters as suggested by Mr. Umakanthan, you have to make a decision.
From India, New Delhi
From India, New Delhi
Sir, various ALC, RLC, and high courts have decided that gratuity should be paid even if one has been compulsorily retired as punishment. Furthermore, no capital punishment under major penalty should be inflicted when an inquiry is being conducted after the superannuation of an employee. Termination is different from compulsory retirement.
G.P. Agarwal, Lucknow
From India, undefined
G.P. Agarwal, Lucknow
From India, undefined
Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Register and Log In.