An employee joined on 16th July '2015. She is on probation for 3 months. Now, she asks for one day of Emergency Leave by email, and management approves 01 day of CL. On the second day, she again requests emergency leave. Management now grants 03 days of CL. The first day of leave was Friday, the second day of leave requested is Saturday, and Sunday is the weekly holiday. Is management wrong or right in granting leave? As per the leave rule, privileged leave can only be availed after serving one full year, but in the case of an emergency, leave can be granted. Please give expert comments on the matter. Regards.
From India
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Most are treating the emergency leaves as advance leaves which they adjust after confirmation.
From India, Lucknow
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Earned Leave/Privilege Leave eligibility is not 1 year but 240 days, but CL/SL can be availed as per the need from the very first month. Any leave exceed the credit can be termed as LWP
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I would be interested in knowing who you are and why you are concerned about the correctness of the managements decision to allow emergency leave.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

If the reasons put forth by the employee are genuine in nature, management is at liberty to sanction advance leave, which can be adjusted once the probation is over.

When an experienced person joins an organization, it is possible that he or she may have quite a few pressing issues at home, and nobody can expect them to ignore the problem and attend to work. Therefore, it is appropriate to grant such leave as a special case. Rules are enacted to enable people to receive guidance and not to block genuine demands.

Similarly, when a person joins an organization from a different city or location, it will take time for the employee to get things organized, such as gas connection, admission to school, etc. Some companies do grant special leave of absence for such genuine issues.

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hello ParthaPratim Gangopadhyay,

Like Saswata Banerjee mentioned, there do seem to be some missing links in the situation you explained. The facts of the case, as you mentioned, relate to CLs BUT your query is concerned with PLs. Please give the FULL details of the situation.

Regards,
TS

From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.