Companies generally ask their new recruits to enter into a bond, say for one or two years. What is the final Supreme Court position on such bonds, and what happens if an employee breaks the bond in between and joins another company? Please guide.
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
Mr. Anand,
A bond is a contract enforceable in law for any breach thereof by the party who promises to fulfill the conditions stipulated therein and prescribes summary damages for such breach. Thus, if an employee breaks the bond and joins another company, the employer will seek to enforce the bond and claim summary damages stipulated in the bond.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
A bond is a contract enforceable in law for any breach thereof by the party who promises to fulfill the conditions stipulated therein and prescribes summary damages for such breach. Thus, if an employee breaks the bond and joins another company, the employer will seek to enforce the bond and claim summary damages stipulated in the bond.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Dear Sir, i have just got one article on this. i am attaching it here. After it’s perusal it seems that bonds are actually not legal.
From India, Pune
From India, Pune
Dear Anand As of now No company has taken the bonds from employee . Each and every terms&condition they are mentioned in Offer letter.
From India, Hyderabad
From India, Hyderabad
Dear Anand,
It is too sweeping to say that a bond is illegal when the Contract Act 1872 itself accords legal force to bonds. A bond is enforceable so far as it does not travel beyond the boundaries stipulated by sec. 27 of the Indian Contract Act. That is the essence of the article.
B. Saikumar HR & Labour Law Advisor Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
It is too sweeping to say that a bond is illegal when the Contract Act 1872 itself accords legal force to bonds. A bond is enforceable so far as it does not travel beyond the boundaries stipulated by sec. 27 of the Indian Contract Act. That is the essence of the article.
B. Saikumar HR & Labour Law Advisor Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Dear Mr. Anand,
The service bond will not be constitutionally valid, as repeatedly clarified by the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Freedom of changing employment to improve service conditions is a vital and important right of an employee, which cannot be restricted or curtailed.
Regards,
J. Basak
HR Professional
From India, Calcutta
The service bond will not be constitutionally valid, as repeatedly clarified by the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Freedom of changing employment to improve service conditions is a vital and important right of an employee, which cannot be restricted or curtailed.
Regards,
J. Basak
HR Professional
From India, Calcutta
At that time, all companies are surely ready for a bond because employees are more than three or six months into their job before changing. Companies start implementing these types of rules and regulations for employees, and I think this is best for the company.
From India, Ahmadabad
From India, Ahmadabad
Mr. Anand Some big & small company are still use bond system for new employee. its not eliminated.
From India, Chennai
From India, Chennai
Dear All,
When human trust and trustworthiness are put to the test, then employee bonds become the order of the day. HR professionals should be aware of how to use this bond as a tool effectively.
A bond is effective before the employee resigns from the organization/company. Any contract with a futuristic clause, other than disclosure of trade secrets, would not be admissible by Indian courts.
The onus of burden of proof is again left on the initiator of proceedings (the employer).
To understand its technicality, read the following:
The negative covenants operative during the term of the contract are not affected by Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act because they are designed to fulfill the contract and not restrict them.
On the other hand, when a restriction applies after the contract is terminated, the restriction on freedom of trade, business, or profession takes the form of a restraint of trade, business, or profession.
This distinction, which is of a fundamental nature, must be borne in mind; otherwise, the perspective will be lost.
With Warm Regards,
V. Govindarajan
Manager-Continuous Improvement
Raysoft Technologies
When human trust and trustworthiness are put to the test, then employee bonds become the order of the day. HR professionals should be aware of how to use this bond as a tool effectively.
A bond is effective before the employee resigns from the organization/company. Any contract with a futuristic clause, other than disclosure of trade secrets, would not be admissible by Indian courts.
The onus of burden of proof is again left on the initiator of proceedings (the employer).
To understand its technicality, read the following:
The negative covenants operative during the term of the contract are not affected by Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act because they are designed to fulfill the contract and not restrict them.
On the other hand, when a restriction applies after the contract is terminated, the restriction on freedom of trade, business, or profession takes the form of a restraint of trade, business, or profession.
This distinction, which is of a fundamental nature, must be borne in mind; otherwise, the perspective will be lost.
With Warm Regards,
V. Govindarajan
Manager-Continuous Improvement
Raysoft Technologies
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.