Dear All,
I have a peculiar case in hand. One of our employees was exonarated in DE for misconduct involving rightous behavior. Subsequently on the Criminal Case arising out of FIR of the incident Court held him guilty of the offences under IPC. However his imprisionment was waived and he was asked to pay fine. But the conviction stands, and only the penalty was waived. Can I terminate him for having found guilty of moral turpitude by Court. My Standing order mentions that I can do so. How do I justify my findings in DE. Please advise along with supporting court cases.
Regards,
Amitabh
From India, Patna
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
I have a peculiar case in hand. One of our employees was exonarated in DE for misconduct involving rightous behavior. Subsequently on the Criminal Case arising out of FIR of the incident Court held him guilty of the offences under IPC. However his imprisionment was waived and he was asked to pay fine. But the conviction stands, and only the penalty was waived. Can I terminate him for having found guilty of moral turpitude by Court. My Standing order mentions that I can do so. How do I justify my findings in DE. Please advise along with supporting court cases.
Regards,
Amitabh
From India, Patna
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Both the inquriy stands of different footings. DE is a Quasi Judical inquiry wherein the evidence is based on preponderance of probability. Wherein in Judicial inquiry the guilt has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. In the department inquiry the CSE has been found not guilty. Whereas in Judicial proceedings he was convicted and was asked to pay fine and the imprisonment was waived.
In this case the conviction is still alive and he can be terminated as per the Standing Orders. Even the Inquiry officer founds him non guilty of the misconduct, you can still differ with the findings with the inquiry officer and go ahead with the speaking orders and terminate him provided there is a clause to that effect in the standing orders.
However, you have to follow the due process of law and then terminate him.
Jay kumtekar
9967542262
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
3In this case the conviction is still alive and he can be terminated as per the Standing Orders. Even the Inquiry officer founds him non guilty of the misconduct, you can still differ with the findings with the inquiry officer and go ahead with the speaking orders and terminate him provided there is a clause to that effect in the standing orders.
However, you have to follow the due process of law and then terminate him.
Jay kumtekar
9967542262
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.
Termination-emp loyment_563.pdf
Termination letter.doc