Ya, but if a new employer asks for the accepted resignation, then on that document, it is mentioned "accepted resignation on 19th June" and "relieved on 19th June." However, the relieving letter will state "relieved on 31st of August."
From India, Mohali
From India, Mohali
In this scenario, I would suggest you only show the relieving letter, which is the ultimate document for the severance of ties with your former employer. Strictly speaking, a separate letter titled 'an acceptance of resignation' is not generally insisted upon. Therefore, it's your choice not to get into a suspicious opening with your new employer. Safely show the letter dated 31.8.2018 for all purposes, which can also be supported by the salary payment up to that date.
Alternatively, you may submit a letter stating 19.6.18 as 'relieved' if it suits you. If you were to report before 31st August, then 19.6.18 would suffice. The choice is yours. These discussions are all in the past tense, reflecting what had happened until now. Have you not reported to the new company so far?
From India, Bangalore
Alternatively, you may submit a letter stating 19.6.18 as 'relieved' if it suits you. If you were to report before 31st August, then 19.6.18 would suffice. The choice is yours. These discussions are all in the past tense, reflecting what had happened until now. Have you not reported to the new company so far?
From India, Bangalore
No I haven’t joined new company as of now. Actually was not sure about earlier letter which was saying accepted and relieved on 19th June. New letter saying relieving date 31st August got on 12th of ocT. so looking at whole scenario kindly suggest can i Sue my company and seeking compensation as because of that letter I couldn’t get new job. As u said I can give relieving letter in new company which says relieved on 31st August got on 12th oct.
From India, Mohali
From India, Mohali
I don't think it's a fit case to sue as you have to prove any loss/damage sustained by you and how you would establish that you missed a new job due to letters with two different dates of DoR. It appears to be a clerical mistake or a failure to apply their mind to possible consequences. It's better for you to settle for a new job instead of wasting time pondering over this confusion in dates.
Since you would have actually been relieved on 19th June and not worked thereafter, it would be logical to stick to this date.
From India, Bangalore
Since you would have actually been relieved on 19th June and not worked thereafter, it would be logical to stick to this date.
From India, Bangalore
Agreed, I would not be able to prove whether I had suffered any loss because of two letters or not. But I have a query: whether issuing two letters with two different relieving dates is right or wrong. If it's wrong, then I don't think I need to prove that I suffered any loss because of it. Because if it's wrong, they are forcing a guy to go ahead with incorrect documents. If I submit these documents to any company, and they find them wrong, they might blacklist me for future hiring as well. So kindly suggest only one thing out of the whole scenario.
From India, Mohali
From India, Mohali
In the circumstances, what is possible and right for you is to write to them, pointing out the aberrations in dates as they appeared in two different documents issued to you. Ask them to issue a clarification and/or request them to withdraw both of these erroneous letters and instead issue a fresh, single, correctly worded letter mentioning the correct date of relief. In any case, you should be prepared to face any consequences after issuing this clarification. I hope that they should not come out with or create yet another confusion afresh.
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.