Abhijit_Barua
47

Dear All, Please provide me which rules said above Rs. 6500/- salary/ wages EPF not deduct. please provide sec no.......... i will wait for ur valuable reply
From India, Kolkata
Abhijit_Barua
47

Dear Sanu,
first u tell me where ur head office at same state ? If not then no need to take EPF code bcoz act.said
• Every establishment which is factory engaged in any industry specified in Schedule 1 and in which 20 or more persons are employed.
• Any other establishment employing 20 or more persons which Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf.
• Any establishment employing even less than 20 persons can be covered voluntarily u/s 1(4) of the Act.
or If same state then same code access for both.
any problem cantact with me

From India, Kolkata
sonu sane
2

Thanks for your valuable suggestion.
let me know,
1)as per act we are eligible because no. of employee are 10- 15 at head office.
n our factory situated in different state no. of employee 300 and factory having PF code
2) if eligible then which code used new one or same of factory

From India, Mumbai
Mehrunisa Basima
66

Dear Sonu,
Since your factory is having a Main Code , then it is sufficient that you take a sub code even if your factory is in another state. For taking a sub code there is no of more than 20 employee. That is what we are doing and are successful in south India.

From India, Kochi
sneakylunatik
Hi All,
Had a doubt about My pf balance. After I tried to check my balance online, I received an SMS that says; EPF Balance in A/C No. xx/xxx/xxxxxxx/xxx/xxxxxxx is EE Amt: Rs xxxxx, ER Amt: Rs xxxx as on 13-08-12(Accounts updated upto 31-03-2011)-EPFO
My only question about this message is why is the account updated only till 31-03-2011? What happens to the amount that was deducted from my salary towards PF untill February 2012?

From India, Bangalore
prabhu17983
2

Dear sneaky,
FYI, ur employer might not submitted the form 3a & 6 for the year 2011-12 to the PF office. So ur PF account is updated till 31.3.2011. Please check with ur organization.
Regards
Prabhakaran S
Hp-9176789679

From India, Madras
sneakylunatik
Thank you so much Prabhu, until i read your response i thought it was the pf office that is not functioning right. No wonder my ex colleagues are quitting that company because of poor management.
From India, Bangalore
varghesemathew
912

Mr Kumar
In terms of finance voluntary coverage of exempted employees is not directly beneficial to the employers.But from HR point of view it is beneficial in long run.
For example it is known that when Jamshedji Tata decided to set up steel plant,the englishmen claimed that they will eat those steel implying that Tata can\'t make steel. But the company had a people oriented policy ,unmindful of the direct benefit,and made so many HR measures wich govt thought of only decades later.The benefit to the company was ,they grew to takeover British steel plants.Now many companys are offering PF to higher salary staff to attract talents and retain them.
Varghese Mathew BIL,PGDPM
Labour/HR consultant.09961266966 TVPM

From India, Thiruvananthapuram
indravadan patel
1

Dear seniors,
I have questions about PF
One of my employee wants PF benefits but his basic salary more than 6550/-Rs. He is not eligible for PF deduction as per low.
Now My question is that he is ready for deduct his pf amount (12%) but management don’t want to pay their pf contribution (13.61%) what can I do on this situation.
Kindly give the suggestion ASAP.

From India, Bangalore
sumitk.saxena
252

Dear sir, Greetings for the day, first of all tell me that earlier that particular employee was covered under EPF or not. Thanks & Regards, From, Sumit Kumar Saxena
From India, Ghaziabad
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.