Anonymous
@psdhingra,Saswatabanerjee,Riteshmaity They gave an offer via mail for the position of hr in one of the sme compnay they insured that i would be given the work of hr as per the job description . i know it takes time to adjust yourself in an organisation i gave my month time to understand and i left only in july after few days and this was not only the reason my salary was very less , water thats the basic necessity was not available during normal office hours and not only that it was taking alot of time to reach office.

so these were the some reason that made me to leave the company. Now the thing is that the never had the practice to give out offer letters since they had the fear if they provide the offer letter to new joiners then they would negotiate with other companies and would leave the company so what ever information i got about the job was a simple offer (ctc disclousre ) on email it was not a attached file separately . the hr wrote a simple email that i have been selected and my ctc was disclosed thats all . since it was just a email conversation between us how you can say it was an offer letter . An offer letter is suppose to happen in a letter head with all requisites like employeer sign , employee sign . It wasnt an email offer letter as well where you sent the offer letter by attaching the offer letter in proper format so how it can be termed as offer letter as the company termed it .one month went i was waiting for my appointment letter too, so i want to ask is it really legal in india to not to give offer letter and appointment letter even after a month ?? Since now i have left the company already stated my problem and reasons to the company before hand then how you can tell me to adher to company policy and rules and regulations when i never signed a document which stated notice period and any other conditions. I was given a salary cheque after the month of June but that does proof i was the permanent employee of their company . As an employee i didnt had any proof that i was working there and similarly when i m not confirmed as an employee how you can tell me to adher the policy that may include pay for damages or notice period.So now i m asking whether they can take legalaction against on me or not , because as per them they provide the offer letter that i dont think so that was an offer letter similarly they think salary cheque proof to be a legal evidence against me .As an Employer how you can take legal action on me when i was already facing these problems even after asking for it N no of times i never got it . My designation was also not there on my salary slip.I WAS ON the probation period for 6 Months so dont think so i was a confirmed employee and definatelly all these i did wrong by leaving the company .Kindly through a light on this matter and suggest how I am wrong on this matter by leaving the company when i already conveyed the reasons and wrote a formal email as well.

From India, Mumbai
Anonymous
**and after all these deifnately i dont think so i did any wrong by leaving the company.
From India, Mumbai
psdhingra
387

A good cocktail of two different stories by assumedly two different persons A1.Kumar and anonymous. And finally the 'anonymous' writes, "**and after all these deifnately i dont think so i did any wrong by leaving the company."

So, what to assume and what not can be anybody's guess, whether problem relates to one person or two different persons and whther he wants solution to what exact problem or wants to get confirmation, whether he did not make any mistake by leaving the company.

If you are the same person, why not come with only one identity or only with anonymity?

I suggest rather suggest you to please take personal appointment from some legal expert on service laws, so that he may be able to extract the really needy information out of your jumbled stories on questioning you appropriately, otherwise you may not be able to lay down your exact problem to the point and exact requirement of the nature of help even on ten clarifications.

However, as stated by Mr. A.1Kumar that he is not financially strong and also has asked about notice to the company, the question arises, if you are not financially sound, what that notice will do, if you are not able to bear the expenditure to fight your case in the court of law? Do you believe that merely legal notice would solve your problem. If not financially sound and not able to bear the expenses for court case, besides waste of time in several years that take in any ligigation, don't think about making such idiotic move. Better concentrate on finding some another job. If you feel, you have sufficient grounds and strong evidence against the company or the placement agency only then take the route of litigation. Otherwise, you would become more financially unsound.

From India, Delhi
saswatabanerjee
2392

Wow !
The thread starts with something
One single thread that suddenly grows roots and branches all over the place.
There are many inconsistencies and many things are hidden, suppressed, created and planted.
Mr. Dhungra's analysis seems correct.
I didn't even understand what the post is about ..... Whether to fight, or just to confirm that life is unfair for someone who didn't do the basic due delligence on accepting a job. If you were refused an offer letter (but actually given one on mail) and you think that's illegal, why did you join an illegal company, I didn't understand. The reasons given are also all over the place.
I chose not to participate in this thread further. I didn't want to add further problems to someone's already complicated life by giving a wrong advice

From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.