No Tags Found!

Dear Sir, I joined a company 7 months back, and in my joining letter, it was mentioned that a notice period of 90 days is to be served after separation from both sides or in lieu of.
But now management has asked me to separate as they no longer need my services due to poor financial condition. But they are asking me to serve a notice period of only one month, and they will pay only if I go to work.

What actions can be taken to demand in lieu of if they are not giving a three-month notice period?
Best regards

From India, Patna
If the organisation is not a factory employing more than 100 employees, the notice period as mentioned in the appointment order itself is illegal because the maximum notice required to be given to terminate employment in an establishment having less than 100 workers is one month. It is true that from the employee who has resigned and gone they should have collected three months' notice pay, and they should have insisted you also to work for tree months if you had offered to go. But if you fight for the two months' salary, the matter will be spoiled and that may even affect your career. Therefore, accept whatever is offered and take a good and clean chit from the employer
From India, Kannur
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals. CiteHR connects professionals facing similar challenges, leveraging a vast knowledge base (100K+ downloads, 150K+ discussions) and targeted emails to engage experts in solving issues.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.