No Tags Found!

Dear all,
Kindly elaborate me about this topic.... why not candidates with good practical knowledge weren't given chance...in tier 1 or 2 companies?what is the reason behind....?
Why companies focus on academic eligiblity criteria? why can't a student who wasn't able to score 60 or 70% in his 10th or 12th ,can be a best talent now with his practical knowledge.
Kindly advise me on this topic
Rgds,
NJ

From India, Bengaluru
KK!HR
1534

These are certain hunches, there are no proofs. I for one involved in many interviews across cadres has consistently looked at the school level academic performance of all candidates as well as consistency in performance and it may have influenced the recommendations too. It is based on the belief that better academic record in school means the basics and fundamentals are strong, the student has hard working nature and the overall personality is accommodative or adjusting nature. There are many cases where the candidates have shown extra ordinary brilliance at a later stage of study in an otherwise lackluster academic record and vice versa. But pointed questions were asked on the sudden change and explanation sought and where the candidate was able to explain, including some tragic story, were also rewarded well.
From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.