Dear members, a news item with the above-mentioned heading has been published in today's Times of India. The news clipping is scanned and uploaded along with this post. Cases of sexual harassment are not new, and our desensitized minds could ignore the news as we ignore other such news. However, this case is different. The harassers are not outsiders but the company's employees. There is a lesson to be learned on various counts from this episode. A case like this was avoidable. While taking this news as a case study for discussion, it is assumed that the news item reflects actual reality and there is no distortion.
Lessons to Leadership:
The report says that the woman has been bearing the brunt of sexual harassment since April. Therefore, more than three months since this has been happening, but then why did she not feel safe to file a complaint on sexual harassment? What was her hesitation? Does her hesitation cast doubt on her trust in the management? In the pursuit of their vision, has leadership sidestepped earning the trust of their employees?
Lessons to the Reporting Authority:
The four members had been sexually harassing their own teammate. How come it was not noticed by their Project Manager or any other authority? Why did the woman employee not feel free to discuss this with her manager? Are managers too impersonal in that company, and do they not like to discuss anything other than technical issues?
Lessons to HR:
The news says that her teammates had been passing lewd comments against her in the lobby or elevator. How come their affront did not reach the ears of HR even though it had been happening in a public place and not in their cubicles? Why did HR not create a mechanism to generate organizational intelligence? Going further, the HR Department is expected to spread awareness of the law on sexual harassment. They also need to create a committee and communicate the details of the committee through regular circulars. HR might have done all this, but when the testing time came, why did it prove ineffective?
Admin Department:
In three long months, how come security personnel did not notice what was going on? If they noticed, why did they feel to look at the other side? While security may not confront the perpetrators directly, they could have at least reported to the security officer. Did it happen, and if it happened, why was no action taken on their report?
Lesson to the Training Department:
The news item says that the trouble started when the team was sent for outbound training abroad. The difference of opinion during this event was the cause of this harassment. In these times of cost-cutting, a company that sends employees for outbound training and that too overseas appears to be cash-rich. However, outbound training is supposed to bring cohesiveness. But then far from cohesiveness, the event sowed the seeds of discord and even tormented one of the members. Why did the training authorities not take feedback from the members on the effectiveness of their training after a couple of months? Why were they silent?
Conclusion:
In these days of social media, nothing remains hidden, and by now, in which company the incident happened must have become viral. Now, who is responsible for the loss of brand image or credibility? Who will take moral responsibility? Is the concept of moral responsibility restricted only to politicians, and corporate honchos are exempted from it? There are serious questions for all of us to introspect. How many of us have time to do it? Now, company authorities say that they will cooperate with the investigating agencies. Do they have any other option?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
Location: Bangalore, India
sexual harassment, case study, earning trust, social media, brand image, City-India-Bangalore, Country-India
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
8131Lessons to Leadership:
The report says that the woman has been bearing the brunt of sexual harassment since April. Therefore, more than three months since this has been happening, but then why did she not feel safe to file a complaint on sexual harassment? What was her hesitation? Does her hesitation cast doubt on her trust in the management? In the pursuit of their vision, has leadership sidestepped earning the trust of their employees?
Lessons to the Reporting Authority:
The four members had been sexually harassing their own teammate. How come it was not noticed by their Project Manager or any other authority? Why did the woman employee not feel free to discuss this with her manager? Are managers too impersonal in that company, and do they not like to discuss anything other than technical issues?
Lessons to HR:
The news says that her teammates had been passing lewd comments against her in the lobby or elevator. How come their affront did not reach the ears of HR even though it had been happening in a public place and not in their cubicles? Why did HR not create a mechanism to generate organizational intelligence? Going further, the HR Department is expected to spread awareness of the law on sexual harassment. They also need to create a committee and communicate the details of the committee through regular circulars. HR might have done all this, but when the testing time came, why did it prove ineffective?
Admin Department:
In three long months, how come security personnel did not notice what was going on? If they noticed, why did they feel to look at the other side? While security may not confront the perpetrators directly, they could have at least reported to the security officer. Did it happen, and if it happened, why was no action taken on their report?
Lesson to the Training Department:
The news item says that the trouble started when the team was sent for outbound training abroad. The difference of opinion during this event was the cause of this harassment. In these times of cost-cutting, a company that sends employees for outbound training and that too overseas appears to be cash-rich. However, outbound training is supposed to bring cohesiveness. But then far from cohesiveness, the event sowed the seeds of discord and even tormented one of the members. Why did the training authorities not take feedback from the members on the effectiveness of their training after a couple of months? Why were they silent?
Conclusion:
In these days of social media, nothing remains hidden, and by now, in which company the incident happened must have become viral. Now, who is responsible for the loss of brand image or credibility? Who will take moral responsibility? Is the concept of moral responsibility restricted only to politicians, and corporate honchos are exempted from it? There are serious questions for all of us to introspect. How many of us have time to do it? Now, company authorities say that they will cooperate with the investigating agencies. Do they have any other option?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
Location: Bangalore, India
sexual harassment, case study, earning trust, social media, brand image, City-India-Bangalore, Country-India
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The situation described in the news article regarding the harassment of a female employee by her male colleagues within the company raises significant concerns about leadership, management oversight, HR practices, security protocols, and training effectiveness. Here are some practical steps and considerations for each department mentioned in the article:
Leadership:
- Establish a culture of trust and open communication within the organization to encourage employees to report any form of harassment without fear of retaliation.
- Conduct regular training sessions for leaders on recognizing and addressing harassment in the workplace.
- Implement a zero-tolerance policy for harassment and ensure all employees are aware of the consequences of such behavior.
Reporting Authority:
- Encourage a supportive and approachable relationship between managers and team members to facilitate discussions on sensitive issues like harassment.
- Train managers on how to identify signs of harassment and create a safe environment for employees to voice their concerns.
HR Department:
- Develop clear reporting mechanisms for employees to raise complaints of harassment, ensuring confidentiality and swift action.
- Conduct regular awareness sessions on sexual harassment laws and organizational policies.
- Review the effectiveness of the existing committee handling harassment cases and make necessary improvements.
Admin Department:
- Enhance security protocols to include monitoring public areas for inappropriate behavior and reporting any suspicious activities promptly.
- Provide training to security personnel on recognizing and responding to harassment incidents.
Training Department:
- Evaluate the impact of outbound training programs on team dynamics and address any issues that may arise post-training.
- Implement feedback mechanisms to gather insights from employees on the effectiveness of training initiatives and make adjustments as needed.
By addressing these areas proactively and collaboratively, organizations can create a safer and more respectful work environment while mitigating the risks associated with harassment incidents.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Leadership:
- Establish a culture of trust and open communication within the organization to encourage employees to report any form of harassment without fear of retaliation.
- Conduct regular training sessions for leaders on recognizing and addressing harassment in the workplace.
- Implement a zero-tolerance policy for harassment and ensure all employees are aware of the consequences of such behavior.
Reporting Authority:
- Encourage a supportive and approachable relationship between managers and team members to facilitate discussions on sensitive issues like harassment.
- Train managers on how to identify signs of harassment and create a safe environment for employees to voice their concerns.
HR Department:
- Develop clear reporting mechanisms for employees to raise complaints of harassment, ensuring confidentiality and swift action.
- Conduct regular awareness sessions on sexual harassment laws and organizational policies.
- Review the effectiveness of the existing committee handling harassment cases and make necessary improvements.
Admin Department:
- Enhance security protocols to include monitoring public areas for inappropriate behavior and reporting any suspicious activities promptly.
- Provide training to security personnel on recognizing and responding to harassment incidents.
Training Department:
- Evaluate the impact of outbound training programs on team dynamics and address any issues that may arise post-training.
- Implement feedback mechanisms to gather insights from employees on the effectiveness of training initiatives and make adjustments as needed.
By addressing these areas proactively and collaboratively, organizations can create a safer and more respectful work environment while mitigating the risks associated with harassment incidents.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Improving Employee Performance Through Workplace Coaching.pdf
NADCA's Safety in the Die Casting Workplace - Introduction.zi p