Dear seniors,
I am working in a garment export company located in a SEZ park. Here, all other companies provide cab facilities to their employees, so I have decided to offer a conveyance allowance to our employees. However, I need to know if conveyance allowance requires deduction for ESI and PF. I also want to understand the tax-deductible limits, any criteria, or the maximum and minimum amount levels.
Please guide me on these matters. Thank you.
From India, Tiruppur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
2I am working in a garment export company located in a SEZ park. Here, all other companies provide cab facilities to their employees, so I have decided to offer a conveyance allowance to our employees. However, I need to know if conveyance allowance requires deduction for ESI and PF. I also want to understand the tax-deductible limits, any criteria, or the maximum and minimum amount levels.
Please guide me on these matters. Thank you.
From India, Tiruppur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Naveen.r,
Conveyance and Travel allowances are covered under ESI benefits. The tax-deductible limits will be above Rs. 800/- per month and above Rs. 9600/- per year. Handicapped persons have non-taxable limits up to Rs. 1600 per month. Please note that the employer may pay any sum depending on the bills produced in relation to the travel made. This is a benefit that is offered by most companies. Sometimes, it also depends on whose car you are using, i.e., Employer's Car (with or without chauffeur)/ Employee's car for conveyance. This amount is not actually an "Allowance" but should be called a reimbursement of Conveyance.
From India, Visakhapatnam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Conveyance and Travel allowances are covered under ESI benefits. The tax-deductible limits will be above Rs. 800/- per month and above Rs. 9600/- per year. Handicapped persons have non-taxable limits up to Rs. 1600 per month. Please note that the employer may pay any sum depending on the bills produced in relation to the travel made. This is a benefit that is offered by most companies. Sometimes, it also depends on whose car you are using, i.e., Employer's Car (with or without chauffeur)/ Employee's car for conveyance. This amount is not actually an "Allowance" but should be called a reimbursement of Conveyance.
From India, Visakhapatnam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Hi,
I do not know the maximum limit for conveyance allowance, but it shall not be deemed as wages, and hence it will not attract ESI (Please refer to the attachment).
The same is the case for EPF too, where the Act states, "In respect of establishments employing 20 or more persons and engaged in an industry notified under Section 6 of the Act (other than the Establishments declared as sick), 12% of the basic pay DA, Cash value of food concession, and retaining allowance, if any, subject to a maximum of Rs. 6500/- per month. Voluntary higher contributions are also acceptable at the joint request of the member and the employer."
From India, Erode
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I do not know the maximum limit for conveyance allowance, but it shall not be deemed as wages, and hence it will not attract ESI (Please refer to the attachment).
The same is the case for EPF too, where the Act states, "In respect of establishments employing 20 or more persons and engaged in an industry notified under Section 6 of the Act (other than the Establishments declared as sick), 12% of the basic pay DA, Cash value of food concession, and retaining allowance, if any, subject to a maximum of Rs. 6500/- per month. Voluntary higher contributions are also acceptable at the joint request of the member and the employer."
From India, Erode
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All,
Here is the Supreme Court order on EPF contribution on allowances.
Both the acts are applicable on the conveyance allowance.
SUPREME COURT ON EPF CONTRIBUTIONS ON ALLOWANCES
It may be recollected that in a Review Petition by Surya Roshni Limited vs. Employees’ Provident Fund and Another, 2012 LLR 42, Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that Section 2(b) and 6 of the Employees’ Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act define basic wages and HRA, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance are not covered in the definition of basic wages but when special allowance, dearness allowance, conveyance allowance and other allowances are paid universally to all the employees, they would be treated as part and parcel of basic wages.
A special leave petition to appeal, as filed, came up for hearing on 13.7.2012, in which the following order was passed :
ITEM NO.MM-128 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. NOS.4-5 in
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8781-8782/2012
(From the judgment and order dated 24-3-2011 in WPC No.1891/2011 and dated 22-11-2011 in RP No.117/2011 of the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)
SURYA ROSHNI LTD. Petitioner(s)
versus
EMP. PROVIDENT FUND & ANR. Respondent(s)
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Here is the Supreme Court order on EPF contribution on allowances.
Both the acts are applicable on the conveyance allowance.
SUPREME COURT ON EPF CONTRIBUTIONS ON ALLOWANCES
It may be recollected that in a Review Petition by Surya Roshni Limited vs. Employees’ Provident Fund and Another, 2012 LLR 42, Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that Section 2(b) and 6 of the Employees’ Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act define basic wages and HRA, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance are not covered in the definition of basic wages but when special allowance, dearness allowance, conveyance allowance and other allowances are paid universally to all the employees, they would be treated as part and parcel of basic wages.
A special leave petition to appeal, as filed, came up for hearing on 13.7.2012, in which the following order was passed :
ITEM NO.MM-128 COURT NO.12 SECTION XV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. NOS.4-5 in
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).8781-8782/2012
(From the judgment and order dated 24-3-2011 in WPC No.1891/2011 and dated 22-11-2011 in RP No.117/2011 of the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)
SURYA ROSHNI LTD. Petitioner(s)
versus
EMP. PROVIDENT FUND & ANR. Respondent(s)
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Travel allowance is not definitely part of the wages. Thus, ESI contribution is not to be deducted from it. As far as the conveyance allowance is concerned, going by the Madras High Court judgment in the Cosmopolitan Club case, conveyance allowance is also not part of wages for the purpose of deduction of ESI contribution. It appears that the views of the High Courts are divided on this issue. In my view, if the conveyance allowance is paid at intervals not exceeding two months, it may qualify for ESI contribution.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
So far as the conveyance allowance for EPF contribution is concerned, it is subject to the order of the Honorable Supreme Court in Surya Roshini's case.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
If the company is paying a fixed allowance every month, whether they name it conveyance allowance or travel allowance, it would attract ESI deductions.
Conveyance/travel reimbursement, where the employee travels and submits the bills as per the company policy or at actual, and the same is reimbursed, would not attract ESI deductions.
As far as EPF is concerned, the deduction is not applicable.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Conveyance/travel reimbursement, where the employee travels and submits the bills as per the company policy or at actual, and the same is reimbursed, would not attract ESI deductions.
As far as EPF is concerned, the deduction is not applicable.
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
conveyance allowance been paid through payroll would attract ESIC (it is deemed necessary to pay esic on conveyance allowance, but must be a part of gross wages).
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Mr. Kamal Prasoon Sinha's note is highly valid. If the conveyance allowance and travel allowance are fixed and paid on a regular basis, it would attract ESIC deductions.
Now I have a little hitch, i.e., if the conveyance allowance and travel allowance are paid through flexi benefits, which are under CTC?
Looking forward to your expert opinion.
Thanks & Regards,
Subroto Mukherjee
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Now I have a little hitch, i.e., if the conveyance allowance and travel allowance are paid through flexi benefits, which are under CTC?
Looking forward to your expert opinion.
Thanks & Regards,
Subroto Mukherjee
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear All,
Please go through the following instruction/circular issued by the ESIC headquarters on travel/conveyance allowance to be/not be considered as wages under the ESIC Act.
I hope this circular will clear all your doubts on the topic.
Regards,
Kamal
No. T-11/13/53/08/2001-Ins.IV Dated: 21/11/2001
Instruction No. 10/2001
To
The Regional Director/Joint Director I/c,
ESI Corporation,
Regional Office/Sub-Regional Office,
Sub: Treating Conveyance Allowance as wages for the purpose of Section 2(9) & Section 2(22) of the ESI Act, 1948.
Sir,
I am to invite your attention to this office Instruction No. 2/97 issued vide letter No.P-11/13/97-Ins.IV dated 27.1.1997 and Item No. 12 of Memorandum No.P-11/13/97-Ins.IV dated 6th Nov., 2000, wherein it was instructed that the traveling allowance for the value of any traveling concession, if paid to the employees in the nature of conveyance allowance, the same is neither wages for the purpose of coverage of employees under Section 2(9) nor it is to be treated as wages under Section 2(22) of the ESI Act for the purpose of payment of contribution.
In the meanwhile, conflicting judgments by some High Courts have been received, necessitating the review of the Instruction No. 2/97 dated 27.1.1997, and Memo dated 6th Nov. 2000. The Madras High Court in its judgment dated 14.11.2000 in LPA No.50/98 (2001 LLR 489) has held that the conveyance allowance paid by the employer to the employees for commuting between residence and place of work should not be taken as wages as the same is nothing but traveling allowance for the purpose of Section 2(22)(b) of the ESI Act.
In another case where transport allowance was paid to the employees by the employer as per a settlement signed by the Employees' Union and the Management, the High Court of Karnataka has held in its Judgment dated 16th March, 2001 (MFA No. 2827/1999) that the transport allowance should be treated as wages as it flows out of a wage settlement thereby it has come within the first part of the definition of wages under Section 2(22) of ESI Act. There is a small difference in perspective. Whereas the Madras High Court has taken conveyance allowance per se, the High Court of Karnataka has specifically dealt with a case of transport allowance/conveyance allowance payable under a wage settlement. However, two different interpretations cannot be made by us for the same nature of payment allowed under identical circumstances. Therefore, it has been decided to accept the rationale behind the decision of the Karnataka High Court, and accordingly, it is advised that fixed conveyance allowance flowing out of a wage settlement should be treated as wages for all purposes.
However, the following should not be treated as wages under Section 2(22) of ESI Act and also for the purpose of deciding coverage of an employee under Section 2(9) of ESI Act.
1. Amount towards conveyance paid or reimbursed to any employee for incurring expenses for specific duty-related journey.
2. Reimbursement of the actual cost of conveyance for coming to work and going from work on production of a ticket or season ticket and subject to proof of actual expenditure.
3. Payment of a certain amount for the maintenance of a vehicle depending upon the Cadre of the official and category of the vehicle and subject to the production of records for actually maintaining the vehicles.
4. Fixed conveyance allowance paid at an interval exceeding 2 months, unless such payment is made as per a contract or agreement.
The Instruction No. 2/97 dated 27.1.1997 and item No. 12 of the Memorandum dated 6th Nov. 2000 stand modified accordingly.
This issues with the approval of the Insurance Commissioner.
Please acknowledge the receipt.
Yours faithfully,
(O. ABDUL HAMEED)
ADDL. COMMISSIONER(REV.)
Copy to:
1. Joint Director(Fin.)/Dy. Director(Fin.), R.O./SRO
2. Joint Director (Vigilance) Zone
3. All Officers at Hqrs. Office
4. All Branches, Hqrs. Office
5. Guard File
JOINT DIRECTOR (REVENUE)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please go through the following instruction/circular issued by the ESIC headquarters on travel/conveyance allowance to be/not be considered as wages under the ESIC Act.
I hope this circular will clear all your doubts on the topic.
Regards,
Kamal
No. T-11/13/53/08/2001-Ins.IV Dated: 21/11/2001
Instruction No. 10/2001
To
The Regional Director/Joint Director I/c,
ESI Corporation,
Regional Office/Sub-Regional Office,
Sub: Treating Conveyance Allowance as wages for the purpose of Section 2(9) & Section 2(22) of the ESI Act, 1948.
Sir,
I am to invite your attention to this office Instruction No. 2/97 issued vide letter No.P-11/13/97-Ins.IV dated 27.1.1997 and Item No. 12 of Memorandum No.P-11/13/97-Ins.IV dated 6th Nov., 2000, wherein it was instructed that the traveling allowance for the value of any traveling concession, if paid to the employees in the nature of conveyance allowance, the same is neither wages for the purpose of coverage of employees under Section 2(9) nor it is to be treated as wages under Section 2(22) of the ESI Act for the purpose of payment of contribution.
In the meanwhile, conflicting judgments by some High Courts have been received, necessitating the review of the Instruction No. 2/97 dated 27.1.1997, and Memo dated 6th Nov. 2000. The Madras High Court in its judgment dated 14.11.2000 in LPA No.50/98 (2001 LLR 489) has held that the conveyance allowance paid by the employer to the employees for commuting between residence and place of work should not be taken as wages as the same is nothing but traveling allowance for the purpose of Section 2(22)(b) of the ESI Act.
In another case where transport allowance was paid to the employees by the employer as per a settlement signed by the Employees' Union and the Management, the High Court of Karnataka has held in its Judgment dated 16th March, 2001 (MFA No. 2827/1999) that the transport allowance should be treated as wages as it flows out of a wage settlement thereby it has come within the first part of the definition of wages under Section 2(22) of ESI Act. There is a small difference in perspective. Whereas the Madras High Court has taken conveyance allowance per se, the High Court of Karnataka has specifically dealt with a case of transport allowance/conveyance allowance payable under a wage settlement. However, two different interpretations cannot be made by us for the same nature of payment allowed under identical circumstances. Therefore, it has been decided to accept the rationale behind the decision of the Karnataka High Court, and accordingly, it is advised that fixed conveyance allowance flowing out of a wage settlement should be treated as wages for all purposes.
However, the following should not be treated as wages under Section 2(22) of ESI Act and also for the purpose of deciding coverage of an employee under Section 2(9) of ESI Act.
1. Amount towards conveyance paid or reimbursed to any employee for incurring expenses for specific duty-related journey.
2. Reimbursement of the actual cost of conveyance for coming to work and going from work on production of a ticket or season ticket and subject to proof of actual expenditure.
3. Payment of a certain amount for the maintenance of a vehicle depending upon the Cadre of the official and category of the vehicle and subject to the production of records for actually maintaining the vehicles.
4. Fixed conveyance allowance paid at an interval exceeding 2 months, unless such payment is made as per a contract or agreement.
The Instruction No. 2/97 dated 27.1.1997 and item No. 12 of the Memorandum dated 6th Nov. 2000 stand modified accordingly.
This issues with the approval of the Insurance Commissioner.
Please acknowledge the receipt.
Yours faithfully,
(O. ABDUL HAMEED)
ADDL. COMMISSIONER(REV.)
Copy to:
1. Joint Director(Fin.)/Dy. Director(Fin.), R.O./SRO
2. Joint Director (Vigilance) Zone
3. All Officers at Hqrs. Office
4. All Branches, Hqrs. Office
5. Guard File
JOINT DIRECTOR (REVENUE)
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
[QUOTE=naveen.r;1951711]Dear seniors,
I am working in a garment export company located in an SEZ park. Here, all other companies provide cab facilities to their employees. I have decided to provide a conveyance allowance to our employees. However, I need to know if conveyance allowance needs to have ESI and PF deductions. Also, I would like to understand the tax-deductible limits. Are there any criteria for the maximum and minimum allowable amounts? Please guide me.
Dear Naveen,
Please do not refer to it as a Conveyance Allowance. Instead, label it as Reimbursement of Conveyance Charges for all employees. Request an undertaking from the employees and obtain their signatures on the document to confirm their Conveyance expenses. Pay them based on vouchers to ensure that PF, ESI, and tax exemptions are applied.
From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am working in a garment export company located in an SEZ park. Here, all other companies provide cab facilities to their employees. I have decided to provide a conveyance allowance to our employees. However, I need to know if conveyance allowance needs to have ESI and PF deductions. Also, I would like to understand the tax-deductible limits. Are there any criteria for the maximum and minimum allowable amounts? Please guide me.
Dear Naveen,
Please do not refer to it as a Conveyance Allowance. Instead, label it as Reimbursement of Conveyance Charges for all employees. Request an undertaking from the employees and obtain their signatures on the document to confirm their Conveyance expenses. Pay them based on vouchers to ensure that PF, ESI, and tax exemptions are applied.
From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
It is still not comprehensible as to how "travelling allowance" can be part of wages even if paid as part of salary every month since the definition of "wages" under Sec. 2(22) itself expressly excludes it without qualifying it. However, since ESI itself laid down certain guidelines in its circular, it is better to go by its circular to compute ESI contributions concerning travelling or conveyance allowance. Thanks, Prasoon.
So far as P.F contribution on conveyance allowance is concerned, it is better to go by the Apex Court's decision in the appeal in Surya Roshni's case, as Trilok Dhir pointed out.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
So far as P.F contribution on conveyance allowance is concerned, it is better to go by the Apex Court's decision in the appeal in Surya Roshni's case, as Trilok Dhir pointed out.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Mumbai.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The current view taken by ESIC is that if the conveyance allowance is paid in fulfillment of a contract of employment or wage agreement, whether express or implied, it would attract the scope of 'wages'. Consequently, contributions are payable on such amount. This is notwithstanding an explicit proviso to the contrary under sec 2(22) of the ESI Act. Incidentally, as few others have referred earlier, the Honorable High Court of Madras has held that the conveyance allowance is not wages under sec 2(220) of the act, and no contributions are payable on such amount.
As I understand it, notwithstanding the High Court decision, most employers in Tamil Nadu state are paying contributions on conveyance allowances for various obvious reasons. Well, if an employer really wants to avoid paying contributions and yet be legal about it, there are ways.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
As I understand it, notwithstanding the High Court decision, most employers in Tamil Nadu state are paying contributions on conveyance allowances for various obvious reasons. Well, if an employer really wants to avoid paying contributions and yet be legal about it, there are ways.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
PF - 12% & ESI - 1.75% should be deducted from the employee's salary as per the Act and rules. However, conveyance allowance does not need to be deducted. If it exceeds the specified limit, then it should be deducted.
Income tax and professional tax must also be deducted as per the Act.
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Income tax and professional tax must also be deducted as per the Act.
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Sir,
During the recent past, different views and decisions have been emerging from various sources regarding the splitting of wages for compliance under various Acts and Schemes. The Hon'ble Madras High Court, in the case of ESI v. Cosmopolitan Club, Chennai, has ruled that Conveyance allowance does not constitute wages for the purpose of attracting ESI contributions.
The Hon'ble MP High Court, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, and other courts have issued their judgments on the splitting of wages for EPF deductions. The EPFO has filed an SLP in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India against the decision of the Hon'ble MP High Court, which is pending. Additionally, the EPFO has suspended its circular dated 23-05-2011, in light of the SLP filed against the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court.
In this scenario, we must await the final verdict of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
A.K. Chandok
RPFC (Retd.)
chandok@yahoo.co.in
09988021715
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
During the recent past, different views and decisions have been emerging from various sources regarding the splitting of wages for compliance under various Acts and Schemes. The Hon'ble Madras High Court, in the case of ESI v. Cosmopolitan Club, Chennai, has ruled that Conveyance allowance does not constitute wages for the purpose of attracting ESI contributions.
The Hon'ble MP High Court, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, and other courts have issued their judgments on the splitting of wages for EPF deductions. The EPFO has filed an SLP in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India against the decision of the Hon'ble MP High Court, which is pending. Additionally, the EPFO has suspended its circular dated 23-05-2011, in light of the SLP filed against the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court.
In this scenario, we must await the final verdict of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
A.K. Chandok
RPFC (Retd.)
chandok@yahoo.co.in
09988021715
From India, Chandigarh
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Update on Surya Roshni Ltd vs EPF Case:
The Supreme Court has stayed the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment in the Surya Roshni Ltd vs EPF case, which held that when special allowance, conveyance allowance, and other allowances are paid universally to all employees, they would be treated as part of basic wages for PF contributions. The court has stayed the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court while hearing the petition filed by Surya Roshni Ltd.
Regards,
Kamal
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Supreme Court has stayed the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment in the Surya Roshni Ltd vs EPF case, which held that when special allowance, conveyance allowance, and other allowances are paid universally to all employees, they would be treated as part of basic wages for PF contributions. The court has stayed the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court while hearing the petition filed by Surya Roshni Ltd.
Regards,
Kamal
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear B. Saikumar,
The case is currently pending before the Honorable Apex Court as the special leave petition filed by Surya Roshni Ltd has been admitted by the Apex Court with an immediate stay order on the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Regards,
Kamal
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The case is currently pending before the Honorable Apex Court as the special leave petition filed by Surya Roshni Ltd has been admitted by the Apex Court with an immediate stay order on the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Regards,
Kamal
From India, Pune
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
ESI-Not-applica ble-on-Conveyan ce-Allowance.do c
PF & ESI.zip