No Tags Found!

Please find attached a scanned copy of Judgment Copy, the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Montage Enterprises Pvt. Ltd (‘Petitioner’) vs. Employees’ Provident Fund has held that certain allowances like conveyance allowance, transportation allowance and special allowance should be treated as part of Basic wages under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (‘EPF Act’). Accordingly, provident fund (‘PF’) contributions should be remitted on such allowances.
From India, Madras
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Montage-Enterprises-Pvt -Ltd-versus-Employees-Provident-Fund.pdf (1.71 MB, 611 views)

Dear Friends, Recently two topics are of great concern for all of us relating to EPF matter. One relates to deduction and deposition of contributions on various allowances as decided by Hon,ble High Courts of Madhya Pradesh & Madras H.C. , and decision of Hon,ble Punjab & Haryana High Court and second is issue of circular by EPFO on the issue of enforcing contributions as per Minimum Wages Act as being read & debated in these coloumns .Again, we have to see that Hon,ble EPFAT has also given two different decisions on the same issue i.e., in the case of G-4 Securitas ,duly upheld by P&H H.C (recently learnt that also has been upheld by the D.B. ),and on the other hand dismissing appeal of Montage Enterprises as well as of Reynold Pens Ltd.,duly dismissed by Hon,ble Madras H.C. with many other similar nature writ petitions.

In the light of above position, in my view, we have to wait for the final verdict of Hon,ble Supreme Court on this issue as and when any SLP is filed by the affected party.

Chandok

ex-RPFC

From India, Chandigarh
Sir,
THE DB version canbe considered now, but its retrospective effect to others is a question of law because the contradiction in Section 2 & 6. So if anybody asked to pay as per the Montage Enterprise & Madras high Court cases, let EPF authorities give the management oppertunity to get re-imbursement or repayment if the SPL willbe infavour of the employer.
REgards
GD

From India, Bangalore
Dear Members,
The EPFO already filed a SLP before SC on splitting of minimum wages on EPF Contribution, the case is not yet listed for hearing.
Ref: G4Security Services Vs EPFO. In the Reynolds pen case, the management of Reynolds obtained an interim stay passed by the DB, against the order of Single Judge. We believe that, the SLP verdict will give more clarity on this issue. Further more, All EPFO, RPFC informed through the Department Circular, since the matter is under sub-judice not to proceed on this issue.

From India, Madras
Yes please. Keeping in view the latest circular of EPFO as stated above, we have to wait for the verdict of Hon,ble Apex Court.
Chandok
RPFC (Retd.)
09988021715

<link no longer exists - removed>

From India, Chandigarh
Illustration 1
Production Incentive/Allowance
A company gives an incentive/allowance of Rs 500 to motivate its workers to give increased production.
Say Rs 500 for producing 500 pieces of safety pins, Rs 400 for 400 pins and so on.
That is- there is a criteria/condition, for getting the allowance is his fulfilling the condition of producing the proportional number of pins.
Attendance Incentive/Allowance
A company gives an incentive/allowance of Rs 200 to motivate its workers to attend their duty the maximum number of days in a month.
Say Rs 200 is given if a worker takes only 2 days leave per month.
Rs 170 are given when 3 to 5 leaves are taken per month and so on.
That is- there is a criteria/condition, for getting the allowance is his fulfilling the condition of attending the maximum number of days a month.
Then according to the judgment given by a Division bench of the M.P. High Court bench at Gwalior in Montage Enterprises Pvt. Ltd vs EPFO Indore :
Both the

From India, Bhayda
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.