We Have a typical case in Gratuity. Would request to please advise A employee of Manager designation has worked with us for 4 Years 11 months and 12 Days. Is he elegible for payment of gratuity
Somraj Dey
Dy Manager HR
From India, New Delhi
Somraj Dey
Dy Manager HR
From India, New Delhi
He/She shd have completed continues service of 5yrs (Continues service means 240 days in each yr)of service.
From India, Coimbatore
From India, Coimbatore
Yes he is ellgible for gratuity, becaue if the payment of gratuity is applicable, then more then 6 months will be round. IF act is notapplicable it will not be calculated. so first be confirm that in your compamny the act is applicable or not... generally company having employees more than 10 is ellgible for the payment of gratuity act.
rashmi
From India, Ahmadabad
rashmi
From India, Ahmadabad
Dear All,
I agree with the comment of vidhya that If a person continuosly work with 4 years and 240 days then He is eligable for Gratuity.
Regards,
ALPESH THAKKAR
ASST. MANAGER - HR
ADVANCED SYSTEK PVT. LTD.
From India, Ahmadabad
I agree with the comment of vidhya that If a person continuosly work with 4 years and 240 days then He is eligable for Gratuity.
Regards,
ALPESH THAKKAR
ASST. MANAGER - HR
ADVANCED SYSTEK PVT. LTD.
From India, Ahmadabad
Dear all He is eligible for Gratuity if has worked 4 years and 240 days in the fifth year. For your ref I am enclosing a judgment in this regard S.Sethupathy Excellent HR Services Erode
From India, Selam
From India, Selam
Hi,
There have been various discussions on this topic earlier. One of the members had mentioned a court ruling (I think Chennai based), where the employee was granted gratuity on having completed 240 days in the 5th year and not acutually completing 5 years. Please refer.
When there is a confusion regarding the interpretation of an Act, I personally suggest that it depends on the management : i.e if they prefer to have a flexible or a rigid approach within the realms of the Act.
Regards
From India, Visakhapatnam
There have been various discussions on this topic earlier. One of the members had mentioned a court ruling (I think Chennai based), where the employee was granted gratuity on having completed 240 days in the 5th year and not acutually completing 5 years. Please refer.
When there is a confusion regarding the interpretation of an Act, I personally suggest that it depends on the management : i.e if they prefer to have a flexible or a rigid approach within the realms of the Act.
Regards
From India, Visakhapatnam
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.