Hello friends I just want to know what is the duty/responsibility & role of Management Representative while conducting the domestic enquiry proceeding. For e.g. To hold a domestic enquiry into the case Disciplinary Authority( A) appointed Enq. Officer (B) and Mgmt Rep.(C). Enq Officer(B) has served enquiry notice fixing the date of enquiry with a copy to MR and Disciplinary Authority(A) and Delinquent Employee. My question is who will intimate the complainant and management witnesses if any to appear before the enquiry proceeding on the scheduled date and time as Enq. Officer (A) has not given any intimation to the Complainant & his witnesses. As far as I am concerned it is the duty and responsibility of the Disciplinary Authority/Appointing Authority who appointed Enq. Officer and Mgmt REp. Please guide me in this regard with any reference/books
pkc3000
From India, Koraput
4pkc3000
From India, Koraput
Dear
The role of the Management Representative is like a prosecutor of the case.It is only the Enquiry Officer who should communicate.During the first hearing of the Enquiry where the delinquent should be present the Presenting Officer will submit the Documents [if documents already not submitted ] and the list of witnesses.In the next hearing the witnesses can be presented without summoning and the testimony can be recorded and marking the documents through the witnesses.Each witness will be examined in Chief by the Presenting Officer .No leading questions permitted and the documents which the witness is either the author or is aware of will be marked.Thereafter the delinquent will be permitted to cross examine each of the witness. The entire proceeding verbatim needs to be recorded.Then the Delinquent will be permitted to present his oral and documentary evidence.
In CITEHR you have downloads which you can look up
With Regards
E-mail : rajanassociates@eth,net,
Mobile : 9025792684.
From India, Bangalore
The role of the Management Representative is like a prosecutor of the case.It is only the Enquiry Officer who should communicate.During the first hearing of the Enquiry where the delinquent should be present the Presenting Officer will submit the Documents [if documents already not submitted ] and the list of witnesses.In the next hearing the witnesses can be presented without summoning and the testimony can be recorded and marking the documents through the witnesses.Each witness will be examined in Chief by the Presenting Officer .No leading questions permitted and the documents which the witness is either the author or is aware of will be marked.Thereafter the delinquent will be permitted to cross examine each of the witness. The entire proceeding verbatim needs to be recorded.Then the Delinquent will be permitted to present his oral and documentary evidence.
In CITEHR you have downloads which you can look up
With Regards
E-mail : rajanassociates@eth,net,
Mobile : 9025792684.
From India, Bangalore
Domestic Enquiry rests on the principles of natural justice, wherein a person charged of committing any misconduct is provided an opportunity to defend himself. Unfortunately, whether this principle is being followed or not, is evident from several responses from HR professionals; wherein an employee alleged to have committed any misconduct is summarily terminated or forced to give resignation. Except in a few good companies and PSU's, these days such principles are seldom followed. Even in the surveys for "Best Employer" or "Best Organization", these principles and even legal compliances; do not find any place; and are focussed more on the perks and "hygiene" factors provided to employees.
Domestic Enquiry being considered as a quasi-judicial process; follows the same pattern as in a Court of justice. The Enquiry Officer acts like a Judge, and the Management Representative acts like the Public Prosecutor and leads the charges.
The charge-sheeted employee is asked by the Enquiry Officer, whether he pleads guilty (or innocent) to the charges partially or in full. Even, if the employee pleads guilty, enquiry is held to substantiate the charges, so that later (if required) in any other Court of Law/Labour Court, it can be proved that the "due process" was held diligently.
The MR puts forth his witnesses and evidences (documents etc.) to prove the alleged charges.
Then opportunity is given to the employee (or his representative) to cross-examine the witnesses. Cross-examination is a tool to bring out the truth; in case witnesses are "tutored" to give biased statements; therefore, leading questions are allowed.
When the arguments are over; which may take several sittings; the Enquiry Officer records his finding - whether the employee had been fount guilty or not, of the alleged charges - and sends it in a sealed cover to the Disciplinary Authority, who had called for an enquiry, and appointed him the Enquiry Officer.
It is totally the jurisdiction of Disciplinary Authority to award the punishment and the quantum; which he is required to do by "applying his mind", which means without any prejudices or heresay.
Warn regards.
From India, Delhi
Domestic Enquiry being considered as a quasi-judicial process; follows the same pattern as in a Court of justice. The Enquiry Officer acts like a Judge, and the Management Representative acts like the Public Prosecutor and leads the charges.
The charge-sheeted employee is asked by the Enquiry Officer, whether he pleads guilty (or innocent) to the charges partially or in full. Even, if the employee pleads guilty, enquiry is held to substantiate the charges, so that later (if required) in any other Court of Law/Labour Court, it can be proved that the "due process" was held diligently.
The MR puts forth his witnesses and evidences (documents etc.) to prove the alleged charges.
Then opportunity is given to the employee (or his representative) to cross-examine the witnesses. Cross-examination is a tool to bring out the truth; in case witnesses are "tutored" to give biased statements; therefore, leading questions are allowed.
When the arguments are over; which may take several sittings; the Enquiry Officer records his finding - whether the employee had been fount guilty or not, of the alleged charges - and sends it in a sealed cover to the Disciplinary Authority, who had called for an enquiry, and appointed him the Enquiry Officer.
It is totally the jurisdiction of Disciplinary Authority to award the punishment and the quantum; which he is required to do by "applying his mind", which means without any prejudices or heresay.
Warn regards.
From India, Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Changing Role of Human Resource Management.zip
Changing Role of Human Resource Management.ppt