Earlier this week, employees at a mid sized tech services company in Bengaluru discovered that their organisation had quietly installed auto capture screen monitoring software that takes random screenshots every 10 minutes without explicit opt in consent. A whistleblower post on Reddit shared internal emails showing that managers were instructed to review screenshots during weekly performance reviews. Employees reacted with shock because the policy was never disclosed during onboarding or in the employee handbook. The leak rapidly spread across social media, triggering public criticism and internal panic as staff began demanding immediate removal of the tool and clarity on how long captured images were stored.
The emotional reaction among employees was one of fear, betrayal, and indignation. Many workers said they felt violated knowing their personal browsing moments, messages, and even bank logins could have been captured involuntarily. Some said they were unable to focus on work out of anxiety. A few team leads admitted quietly that they too were uncomfortable with the surveillance but implemented it under pressure to improve productivity metrics. The sense of moral discomfort escalated into heated debates within company groups about autonomy, trust, and whether HR had become complicit in intrusive managerial practices.
Legally, undisclosed screen monitoring raises major risks under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act which requires explicit consent, purpose limitation, and transparency in handling personal data. Employers may also face consequences under the IT Act if sensitive data was captured without safeguards. HR must urgently pause monitoring tools, issue clear notices, delete non compliant data, and conduct privacy impact assessments. Leadership must create transparent monitoring policies that respect dignity and privacy while addressing productivity expectations. In the modern workplace, surveillance without informed consent is not just a cultural failure but a potential statutory violation with reputational consequences.
What principles should guide ethical monitoring policies in modern workplaces?
How can HR rebuild trust after undisclosed surveillance is exposed?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7The emotional reaction among employees was one of fear, betrayal, and indignation. Many workers said they felt violated knowing their personal browsing moments, messages, and even bank logins could have been captured involuntarily. Some said they were unable to focus on work out of anxiety. A few team leads admitted quietly that they too were uncomfortable with the surveillance but implemented it under pressure to improve productivity metrics. The sense of moral discomfort escalated into heated debates within company groups about autonomy, trust, and whether HR had become complicit in intrusive managerial practices.
Legally, undisclosed screen monitoring raises major risks under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act which requires explicit consent, purpose limitation, and transparency in handling personal data. Employers may also face consequences under the IT Act if sensitive data was captured without safeguards. HR must urgently pause monitoring tools, issue clear notices, delete non compliant data, and conduct privacy impact assessments. Leadership must create transparent monitoring policies that respect dignity and privacy while addressing productivity expectations. In the modern workplace, surveillance without informed consent is not just a cultural failure but a potential statutory violation with reputational consequences.
What principles should guide ethical monitoring policies in modern workplaces?
How can HR rebuild trust after undisclosed surveillance is exposed?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The principles that should guide ethical monitoring policies in modern workplaces include transparency, respect for personal privacy, necessity, and proportionality. Transparency implies that employees should be fully informed about the nature, extent, and purpose of monitoring. Respect for personal privacy means that monitoring should not intrude into employees' personal lives. Necessity means that monitoring should only be conducted when necessary for legitimate business purposes. Proportionality means that the extent of monitoring should be proportionate to the need.
To rebuild trust after undisclosed surveillance is exposed, HR should take the following steps:
1. Acknowledge the Issue: HR should openly acknowledge the issue and apologize for the breach of trust. This can be done through a company-wide meeting or a written communication.
2. Transparency: HR should provide complete information about the surveillance software, including why it was installed, what data was collected, and how long the data was stored.
3. Review and Revise Policies: HR should review and revise the company's monitoring policies to ensure they are in line with legal requirements and ethical standards. This includes obtaining explicit consent from employees for any monitoring activities.
4. Training: HR should provide training to managers and employees on the revised policies. This will ensure everyone understands the policies and their rights and responsibilities.
5. Open Communication: HR should establish open lines of communication for employees to express their concerns and ask questions. This can be done through regular town hall meetings, suggestion boxes, or an open-door policy.
In addition, HR should avoid excessive monitoring and respect employees' right to privacy. They should also ensure that any monitoring is done for legitimate business purposes and not for micromanaging employees. Remember, trust is built over time through consistent and transparent actions. By taking these steps, HR can rebuild trust and create a more positive and respectful workplace environment.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
To rebuild trust after undisclosed surveillance is exposed, HR should take the following steps:
1. Acknowledge the Issue: HR should openly acknowledge the issue and apologize for the breach of trust. This can be done through a company-wide meeting or a written communication.
2. Transparency: HR should provide complete information about the surveillance software, including why it was installed, what data was collected, and how long the data was stored.
3. Review and Revise Policies: HR should review and revise the company's monitoring policies to ensure they are in line with legal requirements and ethical standards. This includes obtaining explicit consent from employees for any monitoring activities.
4. Training: HR should provide training to managers and employees on the revised policies. This will ensure everyone understands the policies and their rights and responsibilities.
5. Open Communication: HR should establish open lines of communication for employees to express their concerns and ask questions. This can be done through regular town hall meetings, suggestion boxes, or an open-door policy.
In addition, HR should avoid excessive monitoring and respect employees' right to privacy. They should also ensure that any monitoring is done for legitimate business purposes and not for micromanaging employees. Remember, trust is built over time through consistent and transparent actions. By taking these steps, HR can rebuild trust and create a more positive and respectful workplace environment.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.