No Tags Found!


Hi all,

Hope you all are doing well. I work for a call center in the HR Department. We have more than 600 employees and are compliant with all statutory regulations related to PF & ESI. Recently, we have recruited a few employees at lower salaries, around 7000 per month. If we deduct PF & ESI, their take-home salary would be very low, and we do not want to impose that deduction on either the employees or ourselves. Is there a way we can accommodate these employees without deducting PF & ESI from their salaries? Perhaps we could classify them as trainees or utilize another permissible classification as per the laws of the land. Additionally, what documentation should we provide for these employees? What kind of appointment letter can we issue, and what should be the salary breakdown?

I look forward to your support and guidance.

Warm regards,
Abhinav Tiwari

From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

If you are following statutory compliance for 600 members, then what difference will it make by adding a few more? The only option is: you cannot show them on your payroll and treat them as daily wage labor, paying in cash, which will not be possible if you are in a BPO. You can take them as trainees and pay them a stipend instead of a salary, but you cannot continue this for too long. Also, don't worry too much about employee take-home pay, as it's mandatory to deduct ESI and PF under the stipulated salary range.

Be positive and follow the statutory and company policies.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Check out the NEEM scheme implemented by the government a year ago. If you take a trainee from a colleague identified under NEEM for skill development, then these trainees are exempted from all statutory deductions for the period of training. However, ensure that they are covered under NEEM or you will be neck-deep in trouble.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hello Abhinav Tiwari,

Srini & Saswata Banerjee have given you actionable suggestions to handle the current scenario.

However, being in HR, I think you should begin to look at the Statutory Deduction of PF differently... which further going, you ought to begin to inculcate among the employees too.

At the end of the day, PF belongs to the employee... the only difference being that he/she can't use that amount now. Just as the take-home salary can't be touched by any employer once it's credited into the employee's account, so too the PF. The PF also accrues interest until any withdrawal is made later. And no employer can touch that amount even after resigning.

We face this situation with junior-level guys who don't really know about PF nor are they informed about it. The basic perception of salary is that 'if you don't get it in-hand, then you can forget about that amount'.

It pays for you... in the long run... to correct this perception and guide the employees to realize the difference between PF and other deductions that don't come back to them ever (IT, PT, etc). If need be, use the services of outside experts... many times the word of an outsider carries more weightage than insiders for such a crowd.

Regards,

TS

From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Is the low salary of Rs.7000/- consistent with the Minimum Wages Act?
From India, Kochi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

The problem is that at lower levels, statutory dues and deductions form 50% of CTC. The government knows that, as it also knows that junior/fresh employees need more in hand. That is why it has come out with schemes like NEEM.

A fresher who gets as low as ₹7000 is not concerned about whatever future benefits PF and ESIC will give. They need money to live now, and what will happen after 58 years is of lesser concern to them. Many have loans that are costing far more than the interest that PF will give.

Pvenu's point was different. How can you pay only ₹7000 when the minimum wage is more? Outside of the metro cities, the minimum wage for unskilled employees is not high.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Abhinav Sir,

As per my knowledge, here are the following points that come out of what you have written:

1) If you are employing any employee at 7K, please check if you are paying the minimum wages as per your industrial standard or not.

2) If you want to appoint them as a Trainee (you will not be able to exclude them from PF because, as per the PF act, trainees will be treated as those who are covered under the Apprenticeship Act, e.g., trainees from govt. ITI / BTRI). (If you want to lower PF deduction, you can reduce the Basic wage and allocate the remaining amount to other allowances.)

3) You cannot exclude them from ESIC either (but you can reduce the deduction by including Washing allowance in the Salary structure; it is permissible up to Rs. 200/month, which does not have a significant impact).

4) If you want to save money for your organization, consider offering a Retention Bonus. This way, you will have an increased amount in hand until the employee leaves/completes the given period. The Retention Bonus does not incur any direct statutory deduction. It will also help in retaining employees, especially in your industry where there is a high attrition rate.

A better approach would be to pay them as per the minimum wages and ensure compliance for all, just as you are doing for 600 employees. The management will also not allow going beyond statutory limits.

Yogesh Ahire

From India , Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Taking basic down below minimum wages is a bad idea. The Supreme Court is likely to give its decision on the above matter against the employers and with retrospective effect.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Hi All,

Thank you so much for your valuable inputs. I understand we must comply with all the statutory compliances that are applicable to us and also understand the value addition/benefits of PF & ESI. However, these employees are at a very junior/entry level. They don't understand the benefits of PF & ESI; all they are bothered about is their in-hand salary. I have tried various permutations and combinations on their salary structures. If we deduct PF & ESI, their in-hand salary reduces to around Rs. 5500. If we add PF & ESI to the employer's scope, i.e., the employer pays the whole share (Employer's & Employee's), then the employer's liability is increased by Rs. 1500 per head/employee.

I think Srini's idea of taking them as trainees and paying them a stipend is a good idea. Also, to not show them on continuous service, we can give a break of say 7-10 days. What do you say?

Warm Regards,
Abhinav

From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Abhinav,

If you want 100% compliance and appoint them as Trainees until PF deductions are implemented because trainees are covered under the PF Act (only Trainees are excluded, those who are covered under the Apprenticeship Act). There is no way you should skip PF and ESIC if you plan to appoint them as Muster/Trainee.

Yogesh Ahire.

From India , Pune
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Engage with peers to discuss and resolve work and business challenges collaboratively - share and document your knowledge. Our AI-powered platform, features real-time fact-checking, peer reviews, and an extensive historical knowledge base. - Join & Be Part Of Our Community.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.