Hey Friends, Its really great that an INdian now owns East India Co.. The co. which rules us for 200 years. Great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Regards, AKG
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Why great? Can anyone elaborate?
East India Company took advantage of divides here and went by the motto 'Divided and rule', that is, Indians are divided and ruled by them. First, they took advantage of 'Divided and rule' in Bengal in 1757. Well, events followed. The British Government became a buffer between Indians and East India Company in 1947. Politically, India became independent. But not in its management. Major Acts remained the same.
The constitution of India was enacted with heavy inputs from The Government of India Act, 1935. Even major Acts like the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Evidence Act remained the same. The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 is on the cards to be repealed.
So the legacy of East India Company that we inherit continues. In this perspective, there is a nativistic upsurge by Anna Hazare to replace the "kale angrezs" (black Englishmen) with clean Indians.
Every company, including yours, stands for a reasonable profit. Will the corporate world be affected by this nativistic upsurge of Anna Hazare called the Second Independent Movement? Will it affect the reasonable profits that the corporate world is enjoying now?
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
174East India Company took advantage of divides here and went by the motto 'Divided and rule', that is, Indians are divided and ruled by them. First, they took advantage of 'Divided and rule' in Bengal in 1757. Well, events followed. The British Government became a buffer between Indians and East India Company in 1947. Politically, India became independent. But not in its management. Major Acts remained the same.
The constitution of India was enacted with heavy inputs from The Government of India Act, 1935. Even major Acts like the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Evidence Act remained the same. The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 is on the cards to be repealed.
So the legacy of East India Company that we inherit continues. In this perspective, there is a nativistic upsurge by Anna Hazare to replace the "kale angrezs" (black Englishmen) with clean Indians.
Every company, including yours, stands for a reasonable profit. Will the corporate world be affected by this nativistic upsurge of Anna Hazare called the Second Independent Movement? Will it affect the reasonable profits that the corporate world is enjoying now?
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.